Connect with us

Felons for Gun Control

2nd Amend.

Felons for Gun Control

Dishonesty is a hallmark of the anti-Second Amendment camp, as proven by the Million Mom March in 2000. This organization:

(1) Used 501(c)(3) tax-exempt money to promote House candidates on its website, and also the Mother’s Day march that the NRA rightly called a thinly-disguised campaign rally for Al Gore.

(2) Solicited donor money, volunteer time, and corporate contributions under fraudulent pretenses, such as the assertion that firearm misuse kills 12 children every day. Numerous members of Congress, along with Senator Dianne Feinstein, made themselves parties to this falsehood. The group also told donors and contributors that the money was going to be used to promote “gun safety.”

(3) Filed a Form 990 tax return that said the group engaged in no efforts to influence legislation, and spent no money to influence legislation or public opinion on legislative issues.



Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.


  1. The Old Man

    February 11, 2013 at 5:21 pm

    Being a hypoctite is a prerequisite for being in politics… Keep in mind “poly” means many.. and we know what tics mean.

  2. Frank W Brown

    February 11, 2013 at 6:00 pm

    We keep electing the vermin, I can’t figure out why!
    Are we really that stupid as a nation? Oh well, I’m locked and loaded, pantry full!

    • Paul

      February 11, 2013 at 9:36 pm

      They get elected Frank, because they cheat a whole lot. Look at the maps at the last election, remember some precincts turned in 150 or more percent of the registered voters in that precinct. 100 percent means every last registered voter voted. 150 percent means that the 50 percent part of it were not registered voters. Many precincts just gave every vote to the illegal party. Thus they are hard to beat if you try to do it honestly.

  3. $13614178

    February 11, 2013 at 6:01 pm

    The above mentioned , and all liberal progressives AND THE MORONS that vote for them have ZERO honor , integrity , and morals , and in fact if they have any PRINCIPLES they are principles of hate , powermongering and destruction of decency .

  4. Nikita63

    February 11, 2013 at 6:15 pm

    You have to be some kind of pervert to be a politician today. There are no values, no integrity no competency on professionalism, no concern for constituencies no HONOR, no responsibility or accountability or any other traditional American value, like conventional morality or freedom of religion unimpeded.There is nothing but rampant corruption in nearly ALL politicians in both parties They have no real credibility and are living proof that Hypocrcracy is it’s own reward.

    • Sam

      February 11, 2013 at 9:37 pm

      Always remember most of them were lawyers before running for office.

      • Nikita63

        February 11, 2013 at 9:43 pm

        Only most odf them? Foolish me, and i thought it was ALL OF THEM!

        • lifeissogood

          February 12, 2013 at 11:15 am

          Guess you forgot about the ones that are Physicians like Dr. Paul.

          • Nikita63

            February 12, 2013 at 4:42 pm

            Why? Was the inestimable Dr. Paul a lawyer , TOO? Now THAT’s news to me! The problem with Dr. Paul is that no one knows what he will do next. At least, if you are truly consevative, BE CONSISTENT.

          • lifeissogood

            February 12, 2013 at 6:33 pm

            He may have other degrees but his first is as a physician. He has made his living as a physician. That takes precedence.
            He also holds degrees in economics.

            He’s also not a conservative. He’s a Libertarian and has been consistent as such.
            Maybe that’s what has you confused.

          • Nikita63

            February 12, 2013 at 6:56 pm

            I knew he was a Libertarian who tended to lean somewhat Conservative. I as was once totally reminded of it quite often by a party from our home venue with whom you may be acquainted; SYBIL, with whom I actually used to agree quite a bit.That is also why I said if you are a Conservative, you should be consistent. I do not think that you would disagree with the notion that personally, I pretty much AM! I don’t ask anyone to agree but, I abhor those who resort to the typical liberal tactics of derision, character assassination, personal insult and utter disrespect as if it were a fine art to be employed against all with the temerity to be possessed of a different point of view: HOW DARE THEY? WELL, I DARE! I will give as good as I get in most cases but I do not like having to resort to such tactics as I do not like feeling soiled by sinking to their level.I see todat, therte was an Article in WND where a psychiatrist of 40 years experience has called liberalism , especially as practiced by a “dangerously Narcissistic,” Obama, a mental disorder. No kidding! He also alludes to other prominent members of the administrastion like Reid, Pelosi and Feinstein! Now then, Why do I not find THAT surprising?

  5. Bob Higginbotham

    February 11, 2013 at 6:16 pm

    Feinstein got her feathers ruffled and ego hurt when her 1994 assault weapon law was allowed to expire. Now she is on a rampage to have something even more ludicrous put in its place. She has lined her pockets thanks to her political ties and now her legacy to be made permanent before her exists with her ill gotten booty. Hypocracy reigns supreme in congress.

    • Bandit

      February 11, 2013 at 8:17 pm

      And if you read that monster that she calls a bill includes everything from revolvers all the way up it has a provision in it that says everything that has pistol grips is to be banned.

  6. wildeagleone

    February 11, 2013 at 6:34 pm

    Feinstein is a funny as a second rate comedian and just as believable. As a California Senator all I can say is I am ashamed of our representative and her flock. (Pelosi, Boxer, Waxman, Watersm Et al)

    • Goshawk

      February 12, 2013 at 8:58 pm

      I see nothing at all “funny” about these anti-American, very dangerous women!

  7. slickzip

    February 11, 2013 at 7:30 pm

    Thery are dumbocrats so it’s OK ,,,,,

  8. Daniel F. Melton

    February 11, 2013 at 9:29 pm

    Can these self serving plutocrats be prosecuted for their blatant lies? If the answer is no, we’ll just have to permanently remove ’em the old fashioned way.

  9. 2War Abn Vet

    February 11, 2013 at 11:39 pm

    I can certainly understand why felons would want gun control. Armed citizens are bad for business.

  10. mogul264

    February 12, 2013 at 12:32 am

    Scenario: I’m a professional house-breaker dpomg my crime armed with a gun. So, now up comes this idiotic Senator with a wild-ass plan to ENSURE my potential victims CANNOT be armed, and must surrender all their guns! Since I’m no idiot, I think I will WHOLE HEARTEDLY support Frankenfeinstein’s
    idea! To think ALL my future crimes would be practically risk-free sure makes MY job easier! This just makes me GIDDY, thinking how EASY my job has become, and how much MORE LOOT I can get! Whee!

  11. Arizona_Don

    February 12, 2013 at 3:47 am

    Dianne Feinstein introduces a new gun law banning certain firearms and claims she would confiscate them all if it were possible. With that in mind consider the following.

    If the objective of a new gun law is to “in the end” ban (or confiscate) all guns ask yourself what would be the best way to go about that? Which is the best furtively way to get that done? Does anyone consider passing laws that don’t work a step in the right direction toward that end

    Who exactly is it the law makers who propose these new restrictive gun laws are fooling? Law abiding citizens or themselves? If the new laws that are proposed are passed and don’t work and they won’t, more restrictive laws will then have to be passed down the road possibly after more innocent folks are murdered. So if the real goal of those proposing these new laws is to confiscate all the guns (as we suspect) this is the way to do it. Pass more and more restrictive gun laws that don’t work so more must be passed and just keep doing this until your goal is achieved. This way it is possible to restrict guns away and not rescind the second amendment. Which they, who propose these laws, know they could never get done.

  12. armydadtexas1

    February 12, 2013 at 11:13 am

    to all you ” pro-abortionist/anti-second amendment types. I’ll make a deal with you. I won’t push down your throats my contempt for your pro-abortion stance if you give the same respect towards the 2nd Amendment. A right based on fact not lies

  13. Sgt. York

    February 12, 2013 at 11:48 am

    Feinstein is another,if we get your guns you will knuckle down and be slaves to the government. It’s all about control

  14. auhunter

    March 5, 2013 at 7:27 pm

    Of course they are all for it. The only thing better than that would be for you to leave your door unlocked. “Assault” weapons ban was a joke, crime rate went up by 3%, no change in the use of so-called assault weapons, since they are used in less than 3% of gun involved crimes anyway. The hand gun is the weapon of choice for criminals, easier to conceal, easier to use, and more easily disposed of.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in 2nd Amend.



Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

To Top
Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become a Patriot Outdoor News insider.

Send this to friend