Connect with us

Obama Calls for Gun Bans, But “Nanny B” Wants More

2nd Amend.

Obama Calls for Gun Bans, But “Nanny B” Wants More

In Tuesday’s presidential debate, President Obama said that he supported a ban on “assault weapons” and implied that he supports restrictions on “cheap handguns” too. No surprises there. As detailed on and, Obama supported banning both types of firearms and many more when he was in the Illinois legislature, and supported banning “assault weapons” when he ran for the White House in 2008, a position he reiterated in the most recent presidential debate.

Obama’s admission, on national TV, no less, should put to rest his supporters’ phony denials about his long anti-gun record and his supposed support for the Second Amendment.

However, Obama’s candor wasn’t enough for New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg–the self-styled Field Marshal of the War on Soda Pop, Salt, Trans Fats, Baby Formula and, of course, the Second Amendment. On Wednesday, America’s most bothersome billionaire busybody said that Obama and Gov. Mitt Romney–who during the debate reiterated his opposition to any new gun control restrictions–had fallen short of his expectations. Thus, Bloomberg said, he intends to form a special political action committee (a so-called “super PAC”) to spend millions of dollars backing candidates who support his gun control agenda, and agree with him on other social issues.



Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.


  1. Pete

    October 20, 2012 at 7:24 pm

    Democrat = Control Freak, or just Freak

    • fliteking

      October 20, 2012 at 8:11 pm


    • Mike Travis

      October 21, 2012 at 6:43 am

      In reality, it is the demoRINOcans who need to go!

    • oldmo

      October 21, 2012 at 8:17 am

      just freak

  2. CaptTurbo

    October 20, 2012 at 8:07 pm

    I hope we manage to ban a whole lot of stupid on November 6!

    • fliteking

      October 20, 2012 at 8:11 pm

      Me to Cappy, me too.

  3. fliteking

    October 20, 2012 at 8:09 pm

    Did I mention Bloomberg is a P-O-S?

  4. fliteking

    October 20, 2012 at 8:10 pm

    Bloomberg is a piece of crap.

  5. Fred_K

    October 20, 2012 at 9:05 pm

    Maybe we could ban Bloombergs.

  6. Mike Travis

    October 21, 2012 at 6:41 am

    @CaptTurbo: I agree though I would elaborate. Why not ban all elected serpents who refuse to enforce the Constitution as it was written and intended by our Founders?

  7. 2War Abn Vet

    October 22, 2012 at 2:20 pm

    This constant scare term “assault weapon” that we hear from the lib/socialist media torques me out. The AKs and AR-15s sold in this country are semi-automatic just like many other sporting weapons; they just look “mean” to the ignorant. A true fully automatic assault weapon is only seen in the hands of a class III approved owner, or blazing away in fictitious movies & TV shows. The actual number of “assault weapon” crimes in this country since 1934 is miniscule.

  8. John Brashear

    October 22, 2012 at 4:07 pm

    the President seems to have forgotten the purpose of the 2nd Amendment, “Being Necessary to the Security of a Free State”….and banning ANY weapon goes against that specific purpose, I am wondering if we will remind those elected individuals what happened to them the last time they tried this ?….the democrats were swept out like the rest of the trash… DC….and if they think WE the People will allow them to disarm US, just so they can tyrannize is easier they are fools…….lets bring Hanging back for corrupt politicians,……”No corrupt Politician should die from natural causes”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in 2nd Amend.



Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

To Top
Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become a Patriot Outdoor News insider.

Send this to friend