2nd Amend.Email

If Gun-Control Worked, Chicago Would Be Mayberry

Gun control advocates have long feigned respect for hunting, self-defense and the Second Amendment, yet always with a qualifier such as “no one needs an ‘assault rifle.’”
Check it out:

Have gun control advocates ever been right?

Though the concept of the powerful few disarming the populace as a means to maintain control is nothing new, modern-day anti-gun activists can trace their roots back to the mid-1970s. With a record of rhetoric and advocacy spanning four decades, they should have a few things right by now.

They haven’t.

When called upon by reporters harboring an agenda of their own, individuals unfamiliar with the gun-rights debate instinctively try to strike an intelligent balance, acknowledging hunting, self-defense and the Second Amendment, but then proclaiming, “no one needs an ‘assault rifle’.”


bloomberg-staring-reuters
Previous post

Bloomberg leaves office today, protected by firearms

Next post

NRA-ILA Executive Director, Chris Cox: You can’t afford to sit out this fight

[vivafbcomment]

Trending on Patriot Outdoor News