Connect with us

New legislation would fire sheriffs who disobey federal gun restrictions

2nd Amend.

New legislation would fire sheriffs who disobey federal gun restrictions

Move over – there might be a new sheriff in town if you don’t go along with federal gun control mandates, says new state legislation. The 380 sheriffs who have vowed to defend the constitutional right to bear arms may now be at risk to lose their jobs.

Many state legislatures are now pushing to passing measures that would remove any sheriff found defying federal law.

In the Texas state legislature, Dallas Democratic Representative Yvonne Davis introduced a measure that would fire any aw enforcement officer who disobeys state or federal orders.

And it gets worse.

The bill even calls for the removal of any law enforcement officer who just promises — either on paper or just verbally — not to enforce any federal gun control mandates that the federal government passes.

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.


  • http://twitter.com/DustyFae StarDust Dolittle

    Must be time to remove our people out of the offices they hold in government and and vote them out of all future government offices. All Obama wants is full dictatorship. We can not let this happen.

    • george

      But we are going to find it difficult to stop now, it has gone on way too long, he has made the pay offs threatened the right people, and rewritten our laws as he sees fit. Even if it were an easy job to remove him, the next several in line are on the same plan he is. We are given a way out, but the majority of people will not even consider taking that way out. Simple statement as it is, Pray to God and He will heal our land and put things back in sync where they belong.

      • CheeseNrice

        Each of us starts at our own level. You find the local commies in your community and “help” them change their minds. Then we move to the larger city councils and help the commies there, change their minds. Next are the reps we send to the statehouses, they are all living around you, go to their house and help convince them they are wrong in their thinking. Little by little we will move on to the commies at national level. Each and every one needs to change their mind. It is up to us to show them how.
        God only helps those who help themselves. It is up to each one of us now.

        • Freedom1911

          No, it has to be done from the top down. Start with the national traitors.

          • Steve Thomas

            It takes a lot of power to affect the ones at the top. We obviosly do not have that much power based on the last election.

      • david

        I think the verse says “If my people, which are called by my name, shall HUMBLE themselves, and PRAY, And SEEK my face, and TURN from their wicked ways, THEN will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.” 2Ch 7:14, HUMBLE, PRAY, SEEK, and TURN, it will take all four, but prayer is needed for to HUMBLE, TURN and SEEK to ever come from the current administration. We do need a real REVIVAL in this land!!!!

        • leewacker

          I refuse to be ‘humble,” especially when those beliefs are shoved back in my teeth, and ridiculed by those who would gladly kick me in my teeth while they laughed!
          And, that is what the liberals are doing now, they are actually kicking us while we are on our knees praying! Time to stand up like real men and women and shove their teeth clear down to their shoe strings!
          If the “Christians” in this country actually believe in their bible, their God and their country, then they would actually gather the enormous “Christian Armies” they are so proud of historically, and DO something! Don’t just give lip service—DO something!

          • Confuscious

            Confuscious Say…….pick up Peter’s sword!

          • gundog1911

            Humble ourselves before God then go out like David and slay the freaking libturds!

      • leewacker

        While your idea has merit, actually the Creators help those who help themselves far more rapidly than those who merely sit on the couch and pray for help! Do you think the Patriots in 1776 actually “prayed” for the Brits to change their ways? Nope! They went out and made sure the Brits’ minds were changed, and this is what we are going to have to do today!
        Obama MUST be challenged on each and every front, no matter where he goes, what he says or does! His adoring followers must be ridiculed, harassed and belittled no matter what!
        The greatest problem we Americans have is that we are just too law-abiding, and really believe our Constitution when it says we are all equal, and should be heard—-
        Well, not it is time for US to be heard, Loud and Clear!

        • mogul264

          What the liberals are doing is acting like a pack of wolves bringing down a big moose! They nip here and there, drawing a little blood each time, dodging kicks and antlers, slowly weakening the mighty animal, until he can run and fight no more. THEN they go in for the KILL~! All this is planned in the Communist Manifesto! And the head of all is our own President!

          We are at that point where the big animal (the U.S.!) is slowed and staggering! All the communists, union leaders, gay ‘rights’ bunch, illegal alien influx promoters, etc, are circling, nipping, biting, tearing chunks of flesh! It won’t be long!

          What we MUST DO is to STOP just trying to fight off one or two at a time, and become like a whirling BUZZ saw ….attack EVERYWHERE at ONCE! The cutting edges of the saw are small, but there are MANY, and they move FAST! E Pluribus Unum!

  • Gray2Hairs

    No limit to stupidity.

  • antiliberalcryptonite

    But it’s ok for ICE, INS, DHS, TSA, and 0bama to pick and choose which laws that they will enforce or not enforce, such as when the State of Arizona calls them and says “we’ve got illegals detained here, come and get them”, but they are then told “No” by these agencies and the Number-One Illegal-In-Chief. What the hell???

    • oldDocBen

      It isn’t hell, but it’s coming.

      • Sky Soldier

        We are experiencing the rise of LAWLESSNESS and Sodom & Gomorrah in America.

        • leewacker

          And, look at what happened to THEM!
          However, it might be through the hands of either Iran or North Korea to deliver a dirty bomb—–
          The Hand writes straight in a crooked line, and no one knows who the messenger might be——

    • MontieR

      ALL of these are ILLEGAL constitutionally, ICE, INS, DHS, TSA. The federal government has NO authority to create these type of enforcement organisations.

    • leewacker

      Obama is also trying his best to do away with the ONE man who tried his best to clear Obama’s name, but found overpowering evidence to the contrary! Now, Sheriff Joe Arpaio is fighting not only for his career, but for his very life and those of his family and friends all because of Obama’s lies and the pandering, slobbering liberals in Arizona—I can tell you as a Native Arizonan, that NONE of these elementals are from Arizona—they’re all urban transplants from elsewhere!
      Arpaio has served this country on all levels of law enforcement, it is time we helped him!
      BACK SHERIFF JOE!

  • Andrew

    So how does that work, when the President AND the Attorney General of the United States have refused to uphold the Defense of Marriage Act and other laws that THEY disagree with? It’s OK for THEM to ignore laws, but a sheriff ignoring a clearly un-Constitutional law is over the line?? Liberal logic is hard to follow…

    • stevervative

      That’s exactly the point! There is no logic to Liberalism…it’s all about knee jerk emotional reaction, with the emphasis on “JERK!”

      • Black Rain

        It is a out, “do as I say, not as I do”. Double standard at the highest level. Obummer does not respect white folks, he really hates rich business white folks and he really really hates and disrespect white folks with a gun.
        If jay Carney says there is nothing in the gun bill that restrict gun onwership, he is lying. He is a mouth piece for Barry, and Barry is a big fat lop-eared half-breed liar.

    • Riggs2500

      Communist dictators is what they are. Sherrifs should arrest all politicians that put any law into effect against citizens Constitutional rights should be arrested for treason.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rick-Zimmermann/1578077838 Rick Zimmermann

        THANK GOD SOMEONE THINKS AS I DO.!!!!! ONLY PROBLEM NONE HAVE THE BALLS FOR THE FIGHT AND THERE IS NO STATES ATTORNEY WILLING TO UPSET ANYONE.!!!!!

        • george

          Maybe we need to start looking for a legal way around the state attorney’s and even the federal attorney General. bamhead seems to be able to go around when ever he wants, and we all know that he is not the legal president. If it were not a conspiracy, I do believe our congress would get much more vociferous and put the brakes on big time. Interestingly the Holy Bible tells us that this is going to happen to us, a few years before the total end arrives.

          • Ranchman

            There IS a way around unjust, illegal and unconstitutional laws; call out the state militias! They can enforce the laws, justice from the civilian side! Sounds like a plan to me!

          • DL Hancock

            Below is an article I just read where DHS & the military are joining forces to get around Posse comitius.
            http://www.liberty.com/blog/homeland-security-military-we-will-absorb-you
            But thats ok, still not enough of them.

          • DL Hancock

            They won’t let me post the URL to the link for Homelans security & Military

            add this to the end of blog/ homeland-security-military-we-will-absorb-you
            for the complete URL

          • Grancop

            Yeah it does, that’s what I’m holding onto besides my gun. I’m retired from the Military and Law enforcement. My old boss is retired also and he has an arsenal. We don’t live close or I would be at his home when someone try’s to take his, LOL it’s not going to be fun for them.

      • Ron

        Amen just what i,m talking about! The Sheriff was elected not appointed so these anti-American left wing pricks have no leg to stand on!!!

      • violater1

        You are right on and hopefully Texas will in fact stick to their good common sensr and bring great political harm to those that have apparently been gaseously mentally inflicted as has yvonne davis sheapparently recently pulled her head from her rectum to come up for air but did not allow sufficent time to clear the affects of methane on her pea brain!

        • CheeseNrice

          Political harm is uesless. There needs to be some arm twisting, from the neck down.

          • violater1

            Yes I am in full accord and agreement with your amendment to my post! Thanks I will gladly take all correction and or redirection when I fail to hit the nail on the head!

      • george

        AHH now a suggestion that I like!

      • dmacid

        I like that idea. Anti American goof ball. Did she ever read the Constitution ? Doubt it.

        • paulrph1

          Of course she did not read the Constitution. She is a Democrat and they think they can run rod-shod over the rest of us and we will just lie down and take it.

      • Brian Evans

        And TRIED for treason! And if found guilty of said treason they should quickly be found swinging from the nearest lamp post. A few hundred of these and the rest will suddenly start thinking twice about trying to pass unconstitutional laws.

        Just my humble opinion.

      • Berzrkr50

        Missouri has introduced a bill that does just that. Gotta love it!

    • hijinx60

      That’s my first thought, Andrew. The POTUS is the head of the Executive branch of government and as such is the :head law enforcer” because he appoints the head of the FBI, CIA, US Marshals’ amd such who answer to him directly. Doesn’t it stand to reason that he SHOULD be the first one that is arrested??

      • Marlin208

        arrested, tried and hung.

      • CheeseNrice

        Both obama and holder should be sweating it out in Gitmo, right now.

      • mogul264

        Yup! Pres. Truman had a desk marker saying, “THE BUCK STOPS HERE!” You can’t get any higher in the Executive Branch! Everything the Exec. Branch does is ultimately Zerobama’s responsibility!

    • boone1

      I will tell you if we don’t take this country back now than you might as well for get it,IT’s now or never it’s up to us stop talking and start doing.

      • CheeseNrice

        Why isn’t any conservative in the House standing up screaming at Yvonne telling her to sit down and shut up?

    • Jeff

      We need to round all the liberals up and give them a one way ticket to Cuba, or china!

      • CheeseNrice

        No, no. no! They must all be eliminated just like a cancer. And a cancer they all are.

      • gundog1911

        Place all of them on a boat to Cuba and then sink it half way there. Instant chum.

        • mogul264

          Not ALL of them! We need a small few to serve as examples of what NOT to do!

          • Steve Thomas

            OK…so long as you keep them in YOUR state.

          • mogul264

            They can be in a special exhibit in Washington, D.C., administered by the Smithsonian!

      • Steve Thomas

        Ya, a one way ticket to China…and sink the boat over the Marianas trench!!!

    • JIM

      iT’S NOT HARD TO FOLLOW IF YOU UNDERSTAND THAT ,IF THE BLIND LEAD THE BLIND ,THEY BOTH FALL INTO A DITCH !!!EXCEPT IT’S A DITCH THAT THE OFFENDERS HAVE DUG FOR THE CONSTITUTION ,RULLING BY FORCE ,WHAT LIES AHEAD IS ANYONES GUESS !!! JESUS IS NEVER FAR AWAY ,CALL ON HIM NOW !!!

  • rikker45

    The state lawmakers have no legal authority to fire a county sheriff, as they are elected to the office, and are employed by the citizens of the county.

    • silvernotes

      ahh, but who pays them?

      • Pete

        In Tx they are paid by county taxpayers from county taxes,not by the state.

        • bill collins

          same in oklahoma

      • pointman49

        That county or parish. Most states however do pay each law officer a stipend but it certainly doesn’t begin to approach their monthly pay.

        • CheeseNrice

          You are probably correct. The rest they make up in extortion and bribes.

      • Rosie46

        The county taxpayers pay them.

      • kenstaff

        They aren’t paid by the state, but by their counties in Texas!

    • bill collins

      very true but it seems that the texas govner thaks like obama that she the compleat ruler of texas time for texas to tare and feather her ass and throw her commie ass out

      • CheeseNrice

        Did you just wake up? Texas hasn’t had a “she” governor since we got rid of the commie, Ann Richards. Anyway, today the Gov. is a “he”, and altho he isn’t the best, I really don’t think he’s as bad as you think. Gov. Rick Perry does and rules for what’s best for Perry. He’s what I call a Perrynista. He’s neither progressive or conservative, he can fill both shoes when needed, but on the whole, he’s not as bad as some we have had in the past. Now if you want to talk about some other State officals, lets talk. Dewhurst is a commie, And Greg Abbott is a Conservative and should be the Governor of the State of Texas for the next 100 years.

      • mogul264

        Maybe we could oust her under a medical clause for the onset of stupidity!

  • bsouthey@ymail.com

    Then why can’t we fire the miscreants who refuse to follow Federal Statutes; i.e. Obama and holder who have refused to follow several statutes and have done “end runs” around the constitution more times than I can count!
    Thank God for the law enforcement officers who honor the 2nd ammendment enough to put their jobs on the line-there are not many others in this country with this kind of courage!!!

    • NoMoreMarxistsInDC

      Good point. I can’t wait till they pass a law to fire sheriffs and some sheriff or sheriffs’ association comes out and declares 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause that they want Obama, Holder and the rest fired for not upholding the federal laws either.

    • george

      Answer to your first question, we can’t fire them, because the great majority of elected people are all on his side in this act of sabotage against our country.

      • leewacker

        Don’t agree there, but I do think some of them are so scared they aren’t thinking straight!

        • mogul264

          Doesn’t matter! If you are NOT against THEM, you are NOT FOR US! You can NOT be a neutral fence-sitter in this matter. Scared of not, we all MUST ACT TOGETHER!

  • PAJ

    Any surprise here? The terrorists in the White House and Congress, who want to overturn any section of the Constitution they do not like, are now putting the Sheriffs of this nation in the position of either violating their oath of office (Support and Defend the Constitution of the US and of their respective states), or obeying illegal laws.
    When I took my oath to serve this great nation, it was to support and defend the constitution, not congress of the white house. And also I was to obey LEGAL orders of those above me.

    • george

      It certainly will prove to the oath maker and every one else involved if he/she meant the whole thing he/she swore to won’t it.

  • tlmartin

    In Texas that bill will be lucky if it gets out of committee but that is as far as it will go. The same can be said for all of the states that have Republican governors.

  • FreedomLuvr

    These politicians are like spoiled children! They will get their way no matter what!

  • Constitionalist

    It’s time for all politicians in office to be removed/impeached for going against law abiding, tax paying Americans and the Constitution! Time for them to be treated like the criminals they are.

    • Patriot

      I agee wih you 100% Constitionalist. They all need to go.

    • Rattlerjake

      Need to go one step further and hang them all. They are like a mosquito, you can swat at them over and over but until you smash the life out of them they will continue to come back. There is only a handful of politicians who have tried to stand firm, but the rest need to be executed for treason and being the domestic enemy that they are.

    • CheeseNrice

      Quit looking for ways that require either people or “laws” to do your job. It ain’t gunna happen. Each one of us have to begin taking on our own responsibilities. Start within your own local area. You know who the commies are. If you don’t you can learn. And then go visit them and help them change their minds. Everything good always starts at grass root level.

      • mogul264

        I’ve done mine! The rest of you need to catch up!

  • semi

    and exactly who thinks they have any authority to fire the sheriffs… they are elected by the citizens and no one else has jurisdiction over them in their county… if they commit a crime, and it is not a crime to not obey an unconstitutional dictate… the citizens are responsible for the sheriff… his pay comes out of their taxes … tell obama to shove it… the “new legislation” does not override the citizens who elected the sheriff or there should be a gunfight at the ok corral. if the citizens got American testosterone…

  • https://www.facebook.com/app_scoped_user_id/100003001185551/ Sandy Daniels

    and thats what we call tyranny. DO WHAT WE SAY OR ELSE!!! i doubt the sherrifs are scared they knew this would happen so stand with your sherrif tell the fed to go to hell

  • DaveO

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, it is time for these sheriffs and other LEO’s to arrest these politicians the break the law of the Constitution, now they are attacking free speech just by saying you don’t want to enforce some maybe law? Hey LEO’s, do America a favor, lock up these commies, they are breaking the laws, not you. If you don’t do it soon, it’s going to be to late. Better yet, don’t bother to bring them in, just take them to some nice quiet spot and put a bullet into the back of their commie heads.

    • CheeseNrice

      It ain’t gunna happen. If we want to change the system, we are going to have to do it ourselves, one pol at a time. Each one of us have to start within our own district and help the commies change their minds. Then we each move to the next level. Did you all forget that any ladder that needs to be climbed has to start at the bottom step? No one is going to do this for us. We each have to take the responsibility to begin. Others will join.

  • UtahDave

    “Dallas Democratic Representative Yvonne Davis” first has proven with her bill that she and every Democrat is anything but democratic. Second she needs to be impeached.

    • Patriot

      We need to start with impeaching that ass hole obama and then get the rest of his goons out. It’s time we take back our country.

      • hagar2935

        We need to start constructing Guillotines in Washington DC & every State Capital for these traitors…….. especially Barack & Moochelle who are the new king & queen saying “let them eat cake”…..

        • CheeseNrice

          What we need to do is start at the grass-roots level. Where we should have been all along. Today, begin to find out where some of your local commie pols live and then convince some friends to come along and go there to help the commie change his mind. Then do that. Change their minds. The movement will take off from there. Begin with the little fish. Pretty soon the bigger fish will either start running (like offshore) or will also have their minds changed. Within months we could be changing minds in DC.

        • mogul264

          Yes, the LYIN’ KING and QUEEN! Wouldn’t it be nice to take 5 vacations in 4 months for the rest of us? This usurper and his moocher-mate need to be evicted from the WH for impersonation and illegal occupancy!

  • William Flesch

    As a retired LE officer I support and will defend the 2nd amendment.

    • Wayne Ogilvy

      Thank you Sir, And to all other Law Enforcement officers be it local PD, County Sheriffs, Or federal Agent’s that will uphold their Oath’s We the People have your sixes And that goes for our military also !!

  • Docs357

    Who ever comes up with this co-Sponcers it doesn’t belong in public office when getting there way is more important the safety of the people they need to go. Fast and far

  • Shagnasty1

    Glory be, another Black woman trying to force her unconstitutional will on others. But I believe the sheriffs throughout our country are also elected officials who work for the citizens of the county who elected them and not subject to the whims of state or federal level government clowns.

  • a_browning

    It doesn’t matter what some dumb Dallas demon-crat submits for punishing sheriffs in TX, it doesn’t have a snowballs chance in Brownsville in August of hitting the floor for a vote.

  • CaptTurbo

    We need to all make sure our sheriffs know that we stand behind them. They must not be intimidated by the thugs. Look to Sheriff Joe as an example.

  • Jon Winters

    It’s time to relieve Yvonne Davis from her job.

  • ron cassano

    we the people,who are the real government.we will be removing you from office,as you are a threat to we the people,and the constitituion,we will be watching your deeds,not your words,as you are a threat to we the people,god bless sheriff joe and cold case posse.yvonne davis you are a treasonous threat to the constitituion

    • CheeseNrice

      Well, you just need to march yourself into the House Chambers and tell her that! Don’t call me for bail money. Why don’t you or others wait till she goes home and then stop by her house and change her mind?

  • James Randazzo

    Tyranny!

  • FRENCHIE1369

    WAIT A MINUTE HERE….SHERIFFS ARE ELECTED OFFICIALS….THEY CAN’T SIMPLY BE FIRED. OR THAT’S WHAT WE’RE TOLD ABOUT ELECTED OFFICIALS, RIGHT ? SO, IF THEY CAN JUST SIMPLY FIRE A SHERIFF, WHY CAN’T WE JUST SIMPLY FIRE ELECTED OFFICIALS WHO DON’T ACT IN OUR BEST INTEREST, OR ACCORDING TO THE LAW, UP TO & INCLUDING THE CONSTITUTION ??? SOMETHING SMELLS FUNNY HERE……………………

  • https://www.facebook.com/app_scoped_user_id/100002198081296/ John Wayne

    Amend the law to read “Any Law” not just “gun control law” and watch the Democrats squirm like hell, because they don’t want ANY Immigration laws enforced. Cherry Picking which laws you want enforced is crap. And, include the President and Attorney General. They have been REFUSING to obey Federal Laws for four years.

  • NoMoreMarxistsInDC

    Sheriffs are elected. Federal laws don’t have the force and authority to override elected representatives unless there is a petition for recall. Time to start a “federal income tax strike” and declare 315 Million dependents/exemptions on all W-2s, W-4s, 1040s, 1099s, etc. As long as we continue to pay taxes and feed the monster, this cr*p will continue to get worse.

    People can tell their employers that they don’t want the employer as the back-up withholding agent, and that they (the people) will withhold their own taxes if necessary. The only way government gets compliance is because employers are withholding agents for the IRS. This is unconstitutional takings in violation of the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause and causing employers to work for free for the IRS in violation of the federal Anti-Peonage laws (specifically the Prohibition against Forced Labor under government threat, 18 U.S.C. Section 1589).

    • CheeseNrice

      Yeah, just try that with the irs. If you want to make a difference, request a new W-4 form from your employer and enter “9” for dependants. If you enter more than that, red lights flash. The paycheck will still show Medicare and SS taken out but all or most of the income taxes will be removed from extortion. If each employee did this, it WOULD make a statement. But most people are scared to rock the boat. And most people have gotten used to giving the fedgov lots of money, interest free all year long, just so they can get some of it back next January. The hipanics down here call it “eencomn”. That’s when they buy their car insurance and title, buy the kids all the next year school clothes and maybe, just maybe put a down payment on a “new” used car or truck.

  • wesvet69

    We are running out of options, folks. That is exactly what they want. Maybe a unified job walk out, refuse to buy anything strike by 100 million conservatives with nerve will avert a worse fate.

  • Sharon Jeanguenat

    Most sheriffs are elected, so how can they fire an elected official? If they can do that, then we should be able to fire the DC politicians!

  • NoMoreMarxistsInDC

    I can’t wait till they pass a law to fire sheriffs and some sheriff or sheriffs’ association comes out and declares 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause that they want Obama, Holder and the rest fired for not upholding the federal laws either.

  • Badger359

    Federal gun restrictions violate the constitution, which is law and so therefore, there restrictions are illegal of them selves. The sheriffs positions are legal and constitutional

  • robertjr

    If it ever comes to that it will be time for states to join together and form a new nation. If those in the government think that our children and grandchildren will fire on their grandparents and parents they are wrong. If they think our military will not uphold their oath to protect the constitution against traitors and dictators in our government they are wrong.

  • ron cassano

    we the people,who are the real government.the longer we allow ovomit/satan and his unamerican treasonous adminstration continue this threat,the longer this pile of feces in the wh,and his treasonous puppets,will continue this detruction of america.i call on wayne/nra/amac/john birch societiy/all militias/all freedom loving,god fearing american veternas/citizens.and donald thrump you stated ovomit/satan in revolution begin.no donald an evolution of we the people,to come together,to communicate/prepare/focus/plan/refine plan,and come under one giiant freedom umbrella,we no longer have a govt.we have a bunch of useless,lawless,treasonous unamerican traitors in ovomit/satan amd his adminstration,who no longer abide by the constitituion or the laws.donald/wayne were and when.we can,t count or trust ovomit/lucifer or his treasonous adminstrationamy more.god bless sheriff joe and cold case posse,dr oily taitz,chuck norris,frank serpico,and all legal american veternas/citizens.yea thou i walk in the valley of the shadow of death,i will fear no evil/ovomit

  • 2War Abn Vet

    As I understand it sheriffs are elected officials, and therefore can’t be fired by legislative fiat.

  • Frank W Brown

    You can’t fix STUPID dontcha know! IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES have occurred, who in congress has any balls? They have to start the ball rolling in the house of representatives. obummer keeps piling on and congress won’t listen to the people!!

    • Patriot Reverend

      Remember, we will be voting come 2014. Lets make a change.

  • CARL

    >>> WHO WOULD FIRE THEM ?????
    ” WE THE PEOPLE ” ELECTED THEM , AND THE FEDS CAN GO BACK TO HELL FROM WHENCE THEY CAME . ” SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL SHERIFF “.

  • floridarooster

    Liberals are totally predictable. They ignore laws, morals, and customs they don’t like, redefine words and concepts, rant against majority opinions, and demonize those who disagree.

  • cptphilb

    Looks like some state legislators need to be tossed out on their ass rather than Sheriffs who clearly know more about the Constitution than the idiots in the legslature!!

  • johnanaguski

    Sheriffs are mostly elected by the people in their county how can the a-holes in D.C. going to fire someone elected by the people. This only brings the revolution closer to reality.

  • TB Haru

    Ahh….another Obama liberal simpleton follower that supports criminals such as themselves. Politicians are in a scumbag category in all their own. The laws of the land ( Constitution and Bill of Rights) are asserted to their needs and nothing more….

  • James Fontana

    Are not all sheriffs elected? If so how can the feds fire them? They can make their lives miserable

    • kenstaff

      She’s not a fed she’s a state rep!

      • James Fontana

        Read it again it says many states but just points out one.

  • cptcoors1

    now, it begins…

  • Mischa

    All this would accomplish is to disarm the people that are law abiding citizens and should never be allowed.

  • leesjokers

    THAT F**KEN COMMUNIST IN THE W.H. IS THE BLAME FOR ALL THE TURMOIL IN THIS COUNTRY……IMPEACH NOW !!!!!!!!

  • mtmountainman

    If I’m not mistaken, we already had a Supreme Court decision when the Sheriffs beat back part of the Brady law. Part of that decision stated that the Sheriffs are the final and ultimate law enforcement in their area, over-riding Feds and everyone else. So all these Communist legislators can go take a long walk off a short pier!!

  • Fourth ID

    I thought that sheriffs could not enforce federal immigration laws ,as per Holder,but can be fired for not enforcing federal gun laws.

  • guestimate

    Wow. So their agenda is full in the open now, holding nothing back. And yet states have the right not to enforce federal law, or even allow federal agents across any particular county lines, if the sheriffs say so.

  • Keith Kilby

    Try this. It should work.

    Have the Sheriff’s arrest the Judges who try to enforce these laws. ANY law that violates the Constitution of the United States is null and void. PERIOD!

  • ReaperHD

    Time to clean house!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Snorri

    What ever happened to S.C.O.T.U.S. for resolving issues of Constitutional law. No one should be surprised at the extremes that Democrat communists and pseudo-communists will go to implement their agenda. DHS will have over a billion rounds of sundry ammo; why?Do you get to experience at 2:00 am: “Intro the truck for a short ride to the detention center with eventual reeducation or the grave”; is that what Constitutional, law abiding Americans have to anticipate?

  • https://www.facebook.com/app_scoped_user_id/1558461120/ Lester Peoples

    Thats the States decision and Not Fed Govt. Sheriffs are elected by the people under each state laws according to the Constitution. Where does this administratuion get off with some of its lamebrained commie/Islam ideas? Read it sometime….before voting in something you havent even read!

  • Bomber7090

    It has no chance of passing in almost all of the states. A law like that is unconstitutional in Pennsylvania. Why make a big deal out of it?

  • standtallall

    There was a novel written in the 60’s “A Nation of Sheep”…I think it is time for a sequel. Time to start recalling some of these politicians and end their gravy train…good point of Pres and AG ignoring laws with impunity.

  • beto

    How about firing presidents who don’t fpllow the laws of America.

  • SBMUTAH

    You can’t fire a sheriff. It is an elected office. These people are crazy and have delusional disorders. They live in some outer-space world and seem to think that they can do anything they want. As it has been said, let them try. They don’t seem to understand that the revolution is just around the corner and all it is going to take is a tiny little shove, and, then it will be all over except for the crying. They will come to realize their worst nightmares.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rick-Zimmermann/1578077838 Rick Zimmermann

    MY FELLOW AMERICANS: THE FEDERAL GOV. DID NOT HIRE THE SHERIFF’S OF ANY COUNTY. and should the State Traitors fire them the State politicians will be in violation of the STATE CONSTITUTION as well as the CONSTITUTION of the UNITED STATES and CAN BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE, does anyone understand that these traitors are sucking up to Osama so when He sends in the DHS and Nato they will be safe in Their cushy little Jobs before the Public can VOTE THEM OUT of OFFICE FOREVER.!!!!STAND FIRM AND TALL “SHERIFF’S” WE THE PEOPLE ARE BEHIND YOU.125%

  • bhudda

    Time to fire legislators that LIE even if its just a white lie to a baby .

  • pysco

    Davis should be fired she is attempting to circumvent elections. Sheriffs are elected officials, *uck the **tch……tell her to stick it.

  • OldDocBen

    Okay, Texas, it’s time to to stand up or shut up. All the crap I’ve heard about the “Great Stateof Texas” will prove them to be bags of hot air if they even consider this crap. See? Didn’t we tell you this is what the Democrats would do I’d we gave them another term? am I the only one suck of these liberal communists from the Obamanation? Time to fight America, if you have the testiular fortitude.

  • cwms2005

    Losing their job for defending the Constitution? It’s later than we think!

    • clbrown

      Yes, it is. The coup is already accomplished, and the perpetrators of the coup are now merely consolidating their power.

      The parallels to the rise of every other dictatorship which came to power through “peaceable” means are remarkable… though the most familiar to most people these days, of course, is how the National Socialist Workers Party of Germany (aka the “Nazis” for short) came to power… not via columns of tanks, mind you, but through free and open elections, where frightened people were promised “hope” and “change” and thus gave over unprecedented power to “those smarter than the voters were.”

      But, of course, Germany isn’t the only example. My own personal favorite happens to be Rome… and people today really need to study how the Roman Republic became a dictatorship ruled by an Emperor (Caesar wasn’t originally a title, it was originally a NAME, recall).

      As Marcus Tullius Cicero said, at the time…

      “Do not blame Caesar, blame the people of Rome who have so enthusiastically acclaimed and adored him and rejoiced in their loss of freedom and danced in his path and gavehim triumphal processions. Blame the people who hail him when he speaks in the Forum of the ‘new, wonderful, good society’ which shall now be Rome’s.”

      Those who fail to remember history are condemned to repeat it…and we’re repeating it again today. But, unlike all times in the past, we’re fast approaching a point where “fleeing tyranny for distant lands” will no longer be possible.

      • rnj2

        Time to deal with them face to face. 550 of them in DC telling 55million how we are going to continue taking their crap, I think the numbers are in our favor.

  • cwms2005

    Pass a local law that says any entity coming to remove the Sheriff for upholding the Constitution is to be shot on sight.

  • Ron

    People its time to go after these pricks, like that Bi4ch in Texas! we the people run this country not them so act like it! storm their office and carry them out!

  • rnj2

    The state law supercedes the federal law when it comes to arms. For a state legislator to make a law to have a sherriff disobey a local law in favor of a federal law is a major conflict of interest. These legislators need a civics lesson to understand how the fed and the states were set up and why it was done this way. They also need to understand fully the Kennedy murders and who was involved and what the similarities are to the recent Aurora and Conneticut shootings,the timing, and the desired reactions and doors it open for the Hitler types who want to take us over like sheep. Ask the Jews, who fully understand how they could have prevented the Holocost, if they will give up their guns. I think not!

  • Joel Stoner

    The main point is how do they intend to enforce this, when Sheriff’s are elected not hired. They can not be fired, and it would undermine the election system to remove them.

    • CrustyOldGeezer

      IF the law provides for ‘removal from office for not actively enforcing legislated law’ of an elected Sherff, I’m all in favor of it being passed unanimously.

      There are large groups of ‘elected officials’ that are actively refusing to enforce laws they voted for and passed into law.

      I even hope they put in a death penalty clause “Only at the discretion of the Jury”.

      We would get rid of a tremendous number of corrupt politicians through arrests and a lot suddenly leaving the country under the cover of darkness.

  • Jerry

    The Sheriff is an elected official and is not one that some dummy politician can fire. They have to be removed from office just in the same way a congressman is or president is removed. So any so called congress bill that some micro-intelligent politician comes up with should be shoved just as far up their behinds as possible.

  • $670769

    Why have only 380 sheriffs saying that they will uphold the Constitution? Are the rest afraid? There are 3,001 counties ( under that term ) in the country, plus140 more that go by parishes, districts, etc,, in Puerto Rico. Guam, Maryland, ( yes ) and so on.

    There should be at least a couple of thousand on board by now. My sheriff will not be one of them. Remember Sheriff Clarence Dumb-nick from Pima County, Arizona?

  • Sky Soldier

    It is time to de-legislate legislators and force these communist Constitution-haters out of office. As it was said in a good movie line “Screw ‘um”.

  • https://www.facebook.com/app_scoped_user_id/100000181718451/ Terry Adams

    Ok people it time to remove the politicans who are pulling this crap. you voted them in and now they are doing pretty much what they want not what you want. they dont care about you . their excuse is that your to stupid to decide things for yourself… get rid of them now. or you soon wont have any rights and no one in place to try and protect the ones you do have.

  • clbrown

    As several other people have stated, a Sheriff is an ELECTED position. So, no legislator can LEGALLY vote to remove such a person. A Sheriff can be IMPEACHED, but cannot be FIRED.

    Yvonne Davis is from a (fairly well gerrymandered) district in the Dallas area. She’s at least a native Texan, though, and her district is at least a bit more legitimate than the one held by Sheila Jackson Lee in Houston (a long meandering strip where the Baltimore native was shipped down to, in order to help with the takeover attempt of Texas).

    Yvonne Davis is, however, nearly as undereducated as Lee is… she has no idea about what she’s supposed to be responsible for. I suspect she really has no idea why it’s not within her purview to “remove” a Sheriff.

    Her position is also very clearly racially-based. See, she thinks that “It’s one of our people in charge now, and those nasty white rednecks hate him because he’s black.” She’s not LYING when she says that… it’s truly what she believes… no matter how insane that may be.

    The thing is… her bill will go nowhere. But… to ensure that it doesn’t come back later, we need to SHINE THE LIGHT ON IT. Don’t just talk here… tell all your friends, relatives, co-workers, etc… anyone you can talk to.

    She’s simply a “useful idiot” but those who are pulling her strings are much, much, smarter… they’re the real threat. And they won’t stop just because one “messenger” fails.

  • Laird

    Wait!! How can any legislature or other elected official of ANY level, fire or remove a duly elected sheriff of any county in America?? They are elected by “the people”, and can only be removed by the people!!

  • Frdmftr

    They can take their legislation and shove it where the sun don’t shine. An elected Sheriff can be recalled by the people who elected him, but he cannot be “fired” by anyone. Only a Democrat or a Marxist (but I repeat myself) wouldn’t understand that.

  • BrassRing

    Where I live, we ELECT our sheriff and the state has little to do with it. They are the ultimate law enforcement entity in the country.

  • violater1

    This law is Constitutionally illegal.Any legislation of this form of supression of first amendment rights if ratified will in fact be illegal and therefore its originator should be in fact held liable!

  • violater1

    Texas you are showing an ignorance of great magnatude! You need to reign in the liberal morons in your State government!

  • $26222150

    In this country, the states are sovereign and the federal government is subservient to them. Just wish the states knew that. The federal government is not God.

  • http://www.fracontract.net/ Vtor

    I DON’T Think So. They might say they are going to Fire the Sheriff, but they can’t fire the people behind him who Elected him.

  • talljohn777

    The stupidity is rampant among politicians….

  • Mark

    Can the legislature fire a duly elected sheriff?

    • CrustyOldGeezer

      Various levels of government in Arizona have been trying to get rid of Joe for a long time.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/UTD2VX4KRQEVYLBIPU4TXWLP74 colt38

    Maybe Yvonne Davis should be subject to a recall for not agreeing with all the laws she has voted against.

  • don

    Sheriffs are elected and the feds have nothing to say about it and they will find out the hard way if they continue supporting this pile of Donkey Dung Barrack Obama because he is the criminal he is involved with organized crime and you want to fire a sheriff for doing his job while the Donkey Dung and his friends launder money murder people break every law ever been passed.

  • george

    Kind of sticky either way. People who are supposed to be smart (politicians) seem to be dumber than rocks. The constitution says the firearm rule (second amendment is NOT to be abridged. So that is the law. Now some idiots are going to decide to force a change in the law and then fire the highest law enforcement officers in their area of responsibility if they refuse to enforce the illegal abridgment of an un-abridgeable law?? WHAT?? As idiotic as these politicians are, I begin to believe those who pay the idiots are not too smart either. If a Sheriff can be fired, so can Senators and Congressmen, I bet even the president could be fired under those conditions. Am I just having a nightmare in my sleep, or is this stuff actually happening?

  • hagar2935

    A Sheriff is a LOCALLY elected official who is NOT subject to being “Fired” by any Federal agency.

  • Gregg

    3/28/2013 at 635Pm. Yvonne Davis is incorrect. These Sheriffs are elected officials who have to be

    removed through a recall election and only if there are enough votes to do so.

    The Federal Government cannot do away with due process in the various states.

    The liberals may be more determined than ever, but a lot of them will back down

    when the firefights at individual houses start. I am hearing a lot ! of hoopla re

    private citizens taking on MRAPS and other technical hardware, but trying to

    subdue a base of private citizens when the country is about to go to war with

    N. Korea would be a tall mountain to climb and a tough row to hoe !

    You are talking about an extremely bloody affair that a government has no
    guarantee of winning. Gregg.

  • MontieR

    First off lets start with this the local sheriff is elected NOT hired and as such can’t be fired. Secondly to remove an elected officer requires either impeachment or a recall election. Thirdly, these democrats need to be arrested by the county sheriff on charges of breach of contract, violation of there oath of office, conspiring to violate the constitution of both federal and state. subversion and finally extortion.

  • DAVID PEACOCK

    America is traveling at light speed to communism;; the war is only months away;; get ready stockpile everything to survive this war.

  • Dan Hecker

    Just talked to my Rep. who heads the Calendars Committee. The Texas bill mentioned is going NOWHERE!!!!

  • liliq

    So these state legislators who impose sanctions on law enforcement for exercising inherent discretion should open up all cities, counties, states and individual law enforcement officers for liability for exercising discretion not to enforce laws–Personal injury and defense attorneys throughout the nation should be breathlessly drooling.

  • ck

    they cannot fire anyone. it is an elected position! Period…end of story.

  • ck

    If you want to fire someone, lets start with obozo!

  • dmacid

    Another power hungry control freak. Lets pray this crazy lib does NOT have the backing to get this through. Maybe they can recall her. Does Gov. Perry have to sign it to be law???? .

  • conservative

    The states didn’t hire them, how is it that they can fire them? Sheriffs are elected.

  • Bobby Kelley

    Yvonne Davis get a life or leave Texas. We don’t need your kind telling Texans how to protect ourselves.

  • tommie3761

    How about a law firing any Federal Agent or Politician who heads, OH SAY, the Executive Branch, for refusing to obey a law, SAY, The Immigration Law! Ummmm? What a bunch of self-righteous hypocrits! And, what Andrew said! And I really like Riggs2500’s suggestion.

  • Charlie

    Welcome to the New World Order ——-Bye Bye to the U.S.A. Thank-you all that did not get it on B.H.O.’s first term in office and voted him back into office. Patriot act,DHS,TSA and all of the other departments under the president we the people are screwed.

  • Daniel Gray

    wont work. Even state officials do not have the legal ability to remove a duly elected person from their office. SO it makes no difference what state idiots or federal idiots want or try to do as each state Constitution clearly says that the office of Sheriff is a local elected decision for each county and must be DECIDED BY each county.

    All this story is , is huff and puff as they cant do anything about it.

  • Marlin208

    Oh dearie, Texas will never allow this to happen. You are barking up the wrong tree. Besides sheriffs have more power than the federal agents in their jurisdiction, so get real.

  • Stan

    It’s amazing how they are more worried about citizens having guns than North Korea test firing missiles aimed at the USA.

  • BabciCathy

    Excuse me…they are elected officials…how you gonna fire them?

    • Stan

      Recall?

      • BabciCathy

        Do you understand what a recall is? It is action taken by the voters, not the legislature. They have no authority over an elected county official…

        • vanguard7

          And that’s one of the beauties of our governmental system. Our state officials have no authority over duly elected county officials but we, as citizens guaranteed rights and being empowered under the Constitution, have authority over ALL of them. It’s time we start exercising our rights and empowerment by “weeding out” these usurpers of our Constitution and the American way and holding them accountable to the oath they all had to take as part assuming their positions in our state and federal governing bodies.

  • Stan

    Looks like they are more worried about citizens gun control than North Korea test firing missiles aimed at the USA! They need to put a cap on their egos, and consider who the real enemy is!

  • http://www.facebook.com/benjamin.fox.98892 Benjamin Fox

    I said the next EO would be to bring State Patrol and Sheriffs under Federal Law, well the states are doing for our states what the EO isn’t needed anymore so the states have become a part of the nazi fed’s. Guns will soon be collected by the DHS and the rest of obozo’s civilian army. Live Free or Die will be more then a saying, it will become the law of the nazi ss troops, so we will find out who is willing for either?

  • vanguard7

    I have an idea that could/might be a work around for any state that does enact such legislation. The residents of any county/city/township that are affected by such legislation in turn getting a new Sheriff or Law Enforcement Officer (LEO) as a replacement who agrees with the Feds, yet make up a strong 2nd Amendment constituency, might in turn promise to make citizens arrests of any Sheriff and/or LEO that would accept the job(s) upon assumption of the position. Furthermore, make a declaration that no law in that county or locality would be deemed enforceable as long as their Sheriff or LEO has not been duly elected in a free and fair election. Any prospective replacement may decide not to take the job if their own freedom is at stake.

  • Ron

    No legislation can fire a sheriff. It is an elected position. Only the people can remove a sheriff. How insane is this scare tactic.

  • russellsmith4

    Tyanny

  • hangman57

    These Sheriff’s are trying to protect the rights of Americans .But what is imporant ,they are protecting the Consitution.and everyones 2nd Amendment rights .Obama is trying to tear up are Consitution. And our Bill of Rights. I back all these Sheriffs that stand up for freedom.

  • Nut Cracker

    Well, turnabout is fair play. How about We the People fire, impeach, and convict of treason any elected official (i.e. the current president) who will not enforce our laws, and defend and support our Constitution.

  • bob

    Note to all politicians: Fire any Sheriff for these reasons and we will fire YOU on election day

    • Doski

      Doesn’t that ASSUME they live long enough to see election day ? Just askin, cause as porus as the borders are . . . . odds of I E D deployment in America is growing by leaps and bounds

  • the hawk man

    regarding your policy…thank you for allowing readers their right to free speech..Really?

  • GridRider

    Well, first they have to pass the law… , second the law has to survive law suits… third they have to prove the Sheriff is “disobeying” the law… and finally… should they pass such a law it would mean the Sheriffs would also HAVE to obey existing immigration law… oops… leftists never understand unintended consequences do they.

  • karolh

    How can they fire a Sheriff that is elected by the people? If that can be accomplished, can we fire Obama and Congress? After all, we supposedly elected them too. Where are the lawyers when you need one? I think we should first fire Diane Feinstein since she was caught in war-profiteering from her leadership on the committee. I have not heard this one time on the 6 PM news, but received this in an email from WND-

    FEINSTEIN QUITS COMMITTEE UNDER WAR-PROFITEER CLOUD
    Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., has abruptly
    walked away from her responsibilities with the Senate Military Construction
    Appropriations Subcommittee after a report linked her votes to the financial
    well-being of her husband’s companies, which received billions of dollars worth
    of military construction contracts she approved.

    As reported in Metroactive, an online report from the Silicon Valley, Feinstein’s resignation
    followed six years of subcommittee work during which time her alleged conflict of interest stemmed from her husband Richard C. Blum’s ownership of Perini Corp. and URS Corp.

    Feinstein, chairman and ranking member of the subcommittee, regularly reviewed and accepted contracts from her husband’s companies for not only construction work for military bases, but also
    addressing “quality of life” issues for the veterans of the United States military services.

    “As MILCON leader, Feinstein relished the details of military construction, even micromanaging one project at the level of its sewer design,” wrote Peter Byrne in the report. “She regularly took junkets to
    military bases around the world to inspect construction projects, some of which were contracted to her husband’s companies, Perini Corp. and URS Corp.”

    He suggested perhaps Feinstein resigned “because she could not take the heat generated by metro’s expose of her ethics… Or was her work on the subcommittee finished because Blum divested ownership of his military construction and advanced weapons manufacturing firms in late 2005?”

    The writer also noted another reason could be that since that subcommittee is responsible for veterans’ “quality of life” issues, perhaps she was trying to distance herself from the military’s failure to provide decent medical care for wounded service members.

    “Feinstein abandoned MILCON as her ethical problems were surfacing in the media, and as it was becoming clear that her subcommittee left grievously wounded veterans to rot while her family was
    profiting from the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. It turns out that Blum also holds large investments in companies that were selling medical equipment and supplies and real estate leases – often without the benefit of competitive bidding – to the Department of Veterans Affairs, even as the system of medical care for veterans collapsed on his wife’s watch,” he wrote.

    The Metroactive report, based on research partly funded by the Investigative Fund of the Nation Institute, noted that as of the end of 2006, federal documents showed three companies in which Blum’s financial entities owned a total of $1 billion in stock got $17.8 million for medical equipment and supplies (Boston Scientific Corp.), $12 million for medical supplies and equipment (Kinetic
    Concepts Inc.), and additional funding through lease contracts (CB Richard Ellis).“You would think that, considering all the money Feinstein’s family has pocketed by waging global warfare while ignoring the plight of wounded American soldiers, she would show a smidgeon of shame and resign from the
    entire Senate, not just a subcommittee,” Byrne wrote. “Conversely, you’d think she might stick around MILCON to try and fix the medical-care disaster she helped to engineer for the vets who were suckered into fighting her and Bush’s panoply of unjust wars.”

    Byrne earlier had documented the connections between the dollars Feinstein voted on and the revenue for Blum’s companies.

    From 1997 through 2005 Blum, with Feinstein’s knowledge, was a majority owner in both URS Corp. and Perini Corp., both of which were regularly among the companies awarded major military contracts proposed by the Department of Defense.

    According to those reports, from 2001 to 2005, URS earned $792 million from military construction and environmental cleanup work approved by MILCON, while Perini collected $759 million for the same.

    Feinstein’s annual Public Financial Disclosure Reports record sizeable family income from investments in the Framingham, Mass.-based Perini and the San Francisco-located URS. But there was no acknowledgment of any conflict of interest, according to Metroactive, a “Northern California
    meta-site” that specializes in arts and entertainment information from area publications: Metro, Silicon Valley’s Weekly Newspaper; Metro Santa Cruz; and the North Bay Bohemian.

    Byrne also reported Michael R. Klein, an adviser to Feinstein and business partner with Blum, said that starting in 1997 he routinely told Feinstein about federal projects coming before her in which Perini had a stake, in order for her to avoid those votes and as such, a conflict of interest.

    However, instead of withholding a vote, she did act on those pieces of legislation, Byrne reported. Ultimately, “the Congressional Record shows that as chairperson and ranking member of MILCON,
    Feinstein was often involved in supervising the legislative details of military construction projects that directly affected Blum’s defense-contracting firms,” Byrne’s report said.

    “Sen. Feinstein has had a serious conflict of interest, a serious insensitivity to ethical considerations,” Wendell Rawls, of the Center for Public Integrity in Washington, told Metroactive. “The very
    least she should have done is to recuse herself from having conversations, debates, voting or any other kind of legislative activity that involved either Perini Corp. or URS Corp. or any other business activity where her husband’s financial were involved.”

    One example was that in 2005, MILCON approved a Pentagon plan to fund “overhead coverage force protection” for Iraq to reinforce the roofs of U.S. Army barracks. About three months later, Perini
    announced an award of a $185 million contract to provide “overhead coverage force protection to the Army in Iraq.”

    Byrne noted when Blum divested ownership of URS and Perini in 2005, the conflict of interest was resolved. “But Feinstein’s ethical dilemma arose from the fact that, for five years, the interests of Perini and URS and CB Richard Ellis were inextricably entwined with her leadership of MILCON … .”

    The investigation examined thousands of pages of documents, including transcripts of hearings in Congress, filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and reports and government
    audits as well as corporate press releases.

    The result? “The paper trails showing Sen. Feinstein’s conflict of interest is irrefutable,” according
    to Danielle Brian, of the Project on Government Oversight.

    “Because of the amount of money involved,” said Melanie Sloan, of the Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington, “Feinstein’s conflict of interest is an order of magnitude greater than [other] conflicts [involving U.S. Rep. John T. Doolittle, former Speaker Dennis Hastert and others].”

    In 2005, Roll Call calculated Feinstein’s wealth at $40 million, up $10 million from just a
    year earlier. Reports show her family earned between $500,000 and $5 million from capital gains on URS and Perini stock. From CB Richard Ellis, her husband earned from $1.3 million to $4 million.

    Public records show Blum’s company paid $4 a share for controlling interest in Perini, and later sold
    about three million shares for $23.75 each.

    The report also showed URS’ military construction work in 2000 was only $24 million, but the next year,
    when Feinstein took over as MILCON chair, military construction earned URS $185 million. Additionally, its military construction architectural and engineering revenue rose from $108,000 in 2000 to $142 million in 2001, a thousand-fold increase.

    In late 2005, Blum sold 5.5 million URS shares, worth $220
    million, the report said.
    Read more at http://mobile.wnd.com/2007/03/40845/#WD … ySJ2lwv.99

    They also are involved in the Gore sale of TV Station to Aljazeera, Feinstein’s husband, Richard Blum was on the board when Gore owned it and is still on the board with Aljazeera. Article is to long to post here. Check it out on “The Constitutional Conservatives”.

  • dpolitics01

    So the Feds or State government can SELECTIVELY decide which laws the want to enforce, that’s O.K.
    But if local sheriff’s abide by the constitutional laws they have sworn to uphold, that’s a problem.

  • Glenn

    The feds, nor the state can fire a Sheriff. The Sheriff is voted into office by the people of the county. Lets review the Constitution! Wake up people.. By the Constitution the Fed are suppose to have limited power. States have let some of their power go going along with what the Feds have passed. We have been programed as such. We have lost ourselves by Politicians that are sworn to defend the Constitution, but only use it to their advantage.

  • http://twitter.com/rlrork55 Rick Rork

    So, either the get fired by communists or shot by Patriots.. Besides, it’s not up to the f’ing state. It’s a county issue.

  • http://twitter.com/rlrork55 Rick Rork

    Time to start shooting.

  • Roadrunner

    Very few democrats have the personnel fortitude to buck the hierarchy of the party but I think you will see some of them start to in the near future. I agree with some of the other comment that some politicians,Judges and Obama be impeached Obama has not proved he is even constitutionally eligible to be president. Born in Kenya flown to Hawaii the next day or 2nd day after being born and was put on record as a live birth

  • CheeseNrice

    Someone should know where Yvonne Davis lives, go to her home and help her see the error of her thinking.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1261917960 Michael Williams

    Tyranny, nothing but TYRANNY….!!! These SOB’s are starting the 2nd Civil War and they know it…they are out of Control…!!!

  • VocalYokel

    While I have no doubt of their intent, neither the feds or the states are in a position to remove the only elected law enforcement officials in the US.
    The County Sheriff is an elected official and, barring malfeasance, I very much doubt that gives anyone other than the voters the power to remove him.

  • http://www.facebook.com/linda.dommel Linda Dommel

    This is totally unconstitutional. Read the constitution & the sheriffs R the last stand in your states, they have the RIGHT to tell federal to stay out of their area!

  • david

    guess our entire sheriff dept and police dept may be fired, and i know about 3/4 of them have said they would never try to enforce these illegal gun control measures, and that’s ok, the have the backing of 90-95 percent of the county population, feel sorry for anyone who tries around here.

  • Sarah Conner

    while they are trying to infringe on our 2nd Amendment rights,maybe we should reconsider the 13th Amendment…I’m just saying let’s make them see red for a change…the left calls US racists now so what’s the difference…damned if we do,damned if we don’t…

  • leewacker

    This legislation overlooks one point: The Sheriffs and all law enforcement personnel swear to uphold the CONSTITUTION, not the government, no matter who might be in office! This is just another example of Obama and his bunch trying to usurp the Constitution!

  • KittyKittyKit

    As USUAL, these MORONS supporting the Obama administration in their act(s) of TREASON against the 1st and 2nd and 4th and 5th and 10th and16th amendments to the Constitution, are NOT SMART ENOUGH to know you don’t “FIRE” a Sherriff. A SHERRIFF is an ELECTED OFFICIAL. To remove him / her, you have to VOTE them out or IMPEACH them.

    That being said, there is still PRECIOUS LITTLE TIME LEFT before OBAMA finishes ARMING his private UNCONSTITUTIONAL ARMY, the DHS, and he does, as HITLER did, he SUDDENLY ATTACKS.

    The FIRST ones he will have ATTACKED are the SHERRIFFS, and he WILL have DHS kill them.

    WE THE PEOPLE still have the RIGHT of the CITIZENS ARREST, where ANY CITIZEN can have any other CITIZEN arrested who is caught in the ACT of committing a CRIME, and the LOCAL law enforcement officers are REQUIRED to CUFF them, BOOK them and JAIL them, and let the COURTS sort it out from there.

    Obviously if ONE or even a HUNDRED CITIZENS step up and call for the ARREST of these TRAITORS, they will defend themselves with their own “armies” of secret service and DHS personel, IN VIOLATION of the U.S. Constitution, and because they are CRIMINALS and TRAITORS actively trying to overthrow the constitution, they WILL use the incident as an OPPORTUNITY to KILL the LAWFUL CONSTITUTION SUPPORTING CITIZENS and the POLICE that would be willing to FULFILL THEIR OATH and take the TRAITORS into custody.

    We have to do it by the THOUSANDS to be successful. The LOCAL police (good ones) will need to feel the SUPPORT of THOUSANDS of CITIZENS at their side as they CUFF the TRAITORS because the TRAITORS, they will be being asked to take into CUSTODY will be POLITICAL OFFICIALS and FELLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS who are too dumbed down to even know they are committing TREASON by defending the TRAITOROUS POLITICAL FIGURES.

    A CERTAIN answer, that WILL WORK, is to ask the over 80 MILLION HUNTERS in America, to do the same thing we do EVERY YEAR, and that is to STEP OUT, on the SAME day, SAME date and SAME time, just like we do on OPENING DAY of hunting season, with our rifles, shotguns, and pistols FULLY LOADED and NEVER TAKE THEM OFF AGAIN.

    ALL 80 MILLION of us, bearing or wearing our weapons JUST LIKE ANY OTHER PIECE OF CLOTHING we put on EVERY DAY. It is CONSTITUTIONALLY OUR RIGHT to do that, and America USED TO DO THAT early in our history and NO ONE COMPLAINED against it. IT WAS NORMAL.

    For those of you FEARLINGS and WOOSEYS who are, right now, in an OUTRAGE at such a suggestion, I say……………sit down and shut your CRY BABY MOUTH.

    WE ARE AMERICANS. We will NOT START A GUN BATTLE with each other and go NUTTS!!

    There is NO HISTORY of ARMED AMERICAN HUNTERS (citizens) going CRAZY and starting gun battles with one another during hunting season OR ANY OTHER TIME outside of a DECLARED action of war or quelling of unlawful conflicts………..NONE.

    The 80 MILLION of us OUT NUMBER by a margin of 12 to 1, the approximately 6.6 MILLION ACTIVE MILITARY and Federal, State, and Local POLICE organizations.

    IF WE ALL STEP OUT TOGETHER…………CAUSING NO TROUBLE…………..JUST WEARING AND CARRYING OUR WEAPONS as GUARANTEED as a RIGHT to the PEOPLE by the Constitution, WHAT CAN THEY DO ABOUT IT???

    WE THE PEOPLE will be BOLD as we SUPPORT each other in making CITIZENS ARREST and the GOOD CONSTITUTIONAL COPS AND SHERRIFFS will be BOLD to take the TRAITORS into CUSTODY and be PROUD to STAND IN THE FACE of the TRAITORS as they CUFF them under the CITIZENS ARREST.

    We can have Ameria back in a HEARTBEAT!! But if we do NOT do this. These TRAITORS will come GUNNING for our ELECTED SHERRIFFS to take them DOWN and OUT permanently.

    WE CAN DO THIS, PATRIOTS. WE CAN BACK OUR SHERRIFFS AND THEY WILL BACK US.
    ANYBODY INTERESTED??? ANY SHERRIFFS WANT TO GET ON BOARD WITH THIS SOLUTION??

    The CONFRONTATIONS are coming and are INEVITABLE. WE CAN DO THIS while we are still STRONG enough to do it, or we can keep on kicking the can down the road a few more days or months until we’ve given our DOMESTIC ENEMIES the time to organize and arm themselves to make their SUDDEN ATTACKS on our SHERRIFFS.

    The TREE of LIBERTY is at a “critical point” of WITHERING beyond RESCUE. The TREE of LIBERTY is watered by only ONE life giving fluid…………..the BLOOD of TYRANTS and PATRIOTS.

    WE THE PEOPLE can take our country back LITERALLY without having to fire a shot if we STEP OUT TOGETHER on the SAME DAY…..DATE……AND TIME, but we have to do it SOON.

    How about no later than JULY 4TH, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. EST (6:00 a.m. PST)

  • Jay W

    Looks like the libs got Dallas. Pretty soon every state in the nation is going to be a 0 toady.

  • Ranchman

    How can the state fire a sheriff when the people elect him? And how can these hypocrites in the White House refuse to enforce laws passed by Congress and nothing happens to them? DOMA, Fast & Furious, all kinds of laws have been broken by these cretins. It’s time to start the revolution boys! It’s time to water the tree of liberty! I’m sick and tired of losing my freedoms from the likes of that commie in the oval office! Enough is enough, the time is now!

    MOLON LABE!

    Remember 1776 & Keep Your Powder Dry!

  • Douglas W. Rodrigues

    So now the government has control over the States? The States are supposed to have control over the government, not the other way around! Keep your guns. It looks like we’re going to need them.

  • Antiques

    Empower citizen arrest of any FEDERAL AGENTS found to be interfering with the CONSTITUTION of THE USA! – And get States to empower their sherriffs or law officers to protect the constitutional right sof it’s citizens, and arrest any Federal Agent found to try and exercise a traitor’s rules against such constitution! Add to the State constitutions, a guarantee of state support for citizens of said state, who upholds the CURRENT laws of the USA. Such must be an EMERGENCY INTRODUCTION of law, as Obama, just as Hitler did, may oust the Constitution for his own personal jihadist Agenda! – have NO DOUBT that Obama is a Muslim extremist with intent to destroy the USA from WITHIN, and be more effective than 911 ever was,covering the WHOLE of the USA. Obama is o dangerous to USA, that he must be ended without any chance of recovery and use anywhere in this world!

  • tool_mann2

    The Office of Sheriff is Constitutionally protected in America. The Sheriff is elected and answers to We The People, not the legislature. The Shire Reeve answered to the King and of course was required to do his bidding. Founding fathers were careful to make sure the new land was owned and operated by We The People. If any commie pinko can introduce legislation or diktate to supercede the Constitution (and get away with it) then we truly are cooked.

  • 9Spoon9

    We had similar Marxists’ ploys trying to work their evils in the MO Capitol. The conservative-controlled MO Gen Assy. put a quick stop to such anti-America bull. I expect the good people in TX to do the same. This is just a grab your attention article. I don’t consider one offering of a bill is grounds for getting all upset, but it does call for citizen action in the form of calls, letters, e-mails, faxes and personal visits with their State elected officials. Make darn sure officials know where their constituents stand. I guess we’ll see how it’s handled. If the people of TX and the wiser folks in the State’s Legislature don’t nip this one in the bud…”Get Ready”.

  • Paul Stramer

    All gun grabbers are OUTLAWS. They hate the law, especially the US supreme law, the Constitution. If they were NOT OUTLAWS they would be proposing an outright repeal of the 2nd amendment according to constitutional process, but no, they know that won’t fly, so they are willing to incite violence against we the people, who are the lawful civil authority in our counties with our lawfully elected sheriffs.

    That makes them Seditionists. The definition of sedition is “to incite violence against the lawful civil authority”. It’s a felony crime. They should be arrested and charged with sedition the instant they throw any anti 2nd amendment bill in the hopper. It is NOT possible to change, abrogate, or replace the 2nd amendment with a mere statute. There is a constitutional process to do it lawfully. Get real everyone. These people are criminals, and need to be in jail the very instant they even PROPOSE such so called “laws”, which are all null and void from their inception, and don’t give me any crap about the so called “corporate government”. It was all done with fraud, deception, threat, duress, coercion, and intimidation, which makes all their contracts UNILATERAL, making them all null and void also. NONE OF THIS WILL STAND BEFORE GOD. They are all liars, and the blind, leading the blind, and they will all fall in the pit of hell for doing this.

    Yes the gun grabbers are the real terrorists and they fully intend to fight a war against the American people with all the ammunition they are buying. They are all monsters, and they are equipping their cannon fodder brown shirts to get slaughtered by we the people when they come for us and our freedom. They just can’t leave peace loving free people alone to work and live and raise their families. They won’t be satisfied until we are all either slaves or dead and they own the whole world. They have made up their minds that if they can’t own it all, they are going to burn it to the ground.

  • chet1462

    I thought that we the people elected the sheriff. I remember when a sheriff was removed by the jerks in Austin and the people in Parker County voted him right back into office where he remained for many years.

  • BCohio

    let obammy send his SS troops out to take our guns. We should send them all back on Flat bed trailers in Body Bags to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. God Bless America and it’s Patriots..

  • https://www.facebook.com/app_scoped_user_id/100000012987373/ Garrey McVicker

    we the true americans that belive in the second amenment, will stand behi these sheriffs, if it comes to that.we need to stand up and fight or lose our rights to freedom .

  • bob novak

    Um Sheriffs are elected, and as such need to have a recall to be fired. That is very hard to do when it comes to sheriffs, not so much for a governor, or legislator, because lets face it, no one likes them anyway, it doesn’t matter what party they are. But a sheriff, that’s another thing completely, they’re closer to civilians, many know their sheriffs personally, so its hard to just recall one. How many recalls have been made on Sheriff Arpio? So good luck with that firing thing idiots.

  • TrapRat

    I thought Sheriffs’ were elected by the people (voters) of their respective districts. How can the federal government fire an elected offical for upholding their sworn oath. An oath sworn to prior to enactment of tyrannical legislation by a tyrannical legislator.? I believe there should be full background and rigerous
    mental testing done prior to anyone runing for any level of public office. With a conservative panel as the deciding panel.

  • brabbie2002

    So Texas isn’t as gun favorable as they propound to be? Or is this dumbocrap just rattling her sword? If you fire the sheriffs, you ignorant twit..who will stand between you and the takeover of your state by the feds? Pull you head out of oblowhole’s backside and start thinking like you have a brain instead of the a–kisser you obviously are! If you fire my sheriff, I will arm myself with every gun I can find because it will be open season on we law abiding citizens. But, then, you are a libtard therefore haven’t anything but mush in that pea sized head of yours. Do you? If they pass this one, you can kiss Texas off as a red state!!!

  • moparfan54

    The Yvonne Davis’s of this country is the problem.

  • Berzrkr50

    The one thing that the people of any state have going for them is the ability to watch for the one introducing such legislation and voting them OUT in the next election. Hand them their hats and tell them “don’t let the door hit you in the a$$, jerk”!

  • TPS12

    All those in congress not upholding the Constitution and Amendments should be fired first, then put in prison!

  • Ruffo

    Now you know why Homeland Security bought the extra ammo and now the armored vehicles are being sent out on railcars. ? They are expecting this and we as gun owners are the targets.

  • auhunter

    See my comment at the end of this article. A Sheriff can not be fired, if elected.

  • Constitutionalgreg2ndamend

    They don’t realize the Sheriff, as the top law enforcer of a county has more power then any legislator. In fact the Sheriff can remove any federal official from the county including ;the FBI.

  • https://www.facebook.com/app_scoped_user_id/1016407914/ Aunt Dot

    How about we remove the people who are passing laws against the PEOPLE???? Let’s ask the Tea Party to start petitions for LEGAL Americans to sign?? How about holding demonstrations across the country in support of our Sheriff’s??? How about putting their medical and retirement on the ballot for citizen vote in view of the fact that WE pay for it????? IF we can elect them, we can remove them… if we pay their wages, we can set limits and if they fail, WHICH THEY HAVE, we start the process to REMOVE them????? Where are the people who know how!!!!

  • BILL

    They all need to go to HELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • mogul264

    Sheriffs are a part of county governments, and do NOT answer directly to states, I believe! So, let me get this straight: a STATE legislature wants to pressure a COUNTY government to force its SHERIFF to DISOBEY the NATIONAL Constitution? Why does not the Sheriff of the county where the state capitol lies (just realized how apt the word ‘lies’ is here!), march into the Legislature and ARREST the law-breaking lawmakers? And why is the STATE Supreme Court not stepping in?

    What part of ” to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed ” do these twits not understand?

  • Sandra Lee Smith

    County sheriffs are ELECTED officials, and can’t simply be “fired” because the current regime doesn’t like the fact that they take their oaths to the Constitution seriously! Neither can legislation be passed to do so legally. That also negates and violates the Constitution.

  • bayman61

    What will they do if the people surround the Sheriffs Office and will not let the Feds in? We ALL have to stand together or they will win.

  • sreynolds

    The people will stadn with the Sheriffs on this one. This will be the straw….

  • Lester Peoples

    Yvonne Davis should be tared and feathered and rode out of town on a rail!

  • Lester Peoples

    Is this Muslim Dictator wanna be so feared by any congressman or woman they cant stand up to our Constitution and Bill of Rights? Must Vigilanti and State Militias have to step in?

  • Marty

    Sheriffs are elected, they are constitutional officers and to just fire them would be unconstitutional, not that the Constitution matters to Barry Sotero or his mindless minions, but a state law can not violate a state constitution.

  • Dino61

    HEY CANNOT DO THAT AND I SINCERELY HOPE THE SHERRIFFS ARE SMART ENOUGH TO KNOW THIS AS WELL!

    Why do you and all of the other many organizations continue to supporting a Defacto Pretender USURPER government
    acting as though our Criminal Public Servants gone Rougue have any power
    or authoritry when in fact they no longer have any power or authority
    to do squat!! Everything they are doing is NULL AND VOID and they do NOT
    have any Legal Constitutional power or force to enforce anything. They
    are all operating OUTSIDE the Constitution!!

    Obama is a proven
    known FRAUD USURPER and as such he and his signature bares absolutely no

    power or authority whatsoever! and they want to imprison people like me

    for standing up for our Nation our Constitution and everything she
    stands for…. limiting our ability to communicate organize against
    their Seditious Treason against this Nation and our people. Well, what
    about them….what about arresting them for their
    Extreme abuse and dishonor to the Sworn Oaths they took to protect and
    defend? what about all the Crimes they have committed the Stealing and
    Embezzlement of Trillions of Dollars their violations of the Logan Act
    meeting in secret behind the backs of the American people meeting in
    secret with Foreign governments and eneymy agents providing aid and
    comfort to them planning

    for the deliberate destruction of America the Disarming of America
    (which will never happen and there will be a severe price to pay for
    attempting it). Using our own tax dollars against us deliberately
    participating in Mass Genocide against the American people and now they
    are open about their criminal agenda and now
    want to tag us and track us like livestock (not happening) they will
    hang first! Using our moneys against us building underground dumb bases
    and Nazi
    Hitler FEMA PRISON Camps behind our backs poisoning our Air and soil
    with CHEMTRAILS, working with Monsanto and Bill gates to poison our Food
    water and vaccines……and you wonder where our money is going?????
    They stop allowing children from visiting the White House, the PEOPLES
    HOUSE cause there is no money!? yet they can easily find 250 million to
    support the Muslim Brotherhood?? (because they are to busy stealing it
    and using it to destroy America and the American people because it is
    the only way they will be able to bring about their perverted criminal
    Nazi 4th Reich NWO) This Government and its criminal associates are all
    guilty of Treason
    and Mis Prison of Treason as well as a host of other crimes…….HELL
    NO! Over our dead bodies and theirs HELL NO its not happening!

    They
    are all biting off far more than they can chew and they are going to
    all end up at the end of a rope where they belong! The 2nd Revolution is
    close at hand and it won’t even be anything like the a Cival war
    becasue its going to be all 50 States and our armed forces against them!

    As
    long as this NWO Puppet FRAUD USURPER is in the office of President the
    Constitution is clear: As long as there is a FRAUD USURPING the office
    of President Congress and the Senate can make and pass NO LAWS!!!!

    No laws of Congress are valid

    “Congress can pass no law while a usurper pretends to occupy “the
    Office of President.” The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which
    shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall,
    before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United
    States” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to a usurper posturing as
    “the President of the United States,” but to the true and rightful
    President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White
    House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to
    [him].” If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a
    “Law.” And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and
    “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will
    be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper,
    Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it
    acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.””

    And

    He Could not be Removed Except by Force

    If Obama does become an usurper posturing as “the President,”
    Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual
    President, he cannot be “removed from Office on Impeachment for, and
    Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”
    (see Article II, Section 4). In that case, some other public officials
    would have to arrest him—with physical force, if he would not go along
    quietly—in order to prevent him from continuing his imposture.
    Obviously, this could possibly lead to armed conflicts within the
    General Government itself, or among the States and the people.

    Bear in mind that as an imposter Commander–in-Chief of the Armed Forces, “he will be entitled to no obedience whatsoever from anyone in those forces.
    Indeed, for officers or men to follow any of his purported “orders”
    will constitute a serious breach of military discipline—and in extreme
    circumstances perhaps even “war crimes.” In addition, no one in any
    civilian agency in the Executive Branch of the General Government will
    be required to put into effect any of Obama’s purported “proclamations,”
    “executive orders,” or “directives” (Viera, J.).

  • http://www.facebook.com/saveonfiberglasssupply Save On Fiberglass

    Why is OK to enforce Federal gun laws but they cannot enforce federal immigration laws?

  • Stealth

    What a joke…this flipping Lib-‘Bitch’ thinks the Sheriffs are going to ALLOW themselves to be arrested?? What a joke!! All they have to do in their municipalities is DEPUTIZE shitloads of people who would back them ( and their Deputy’s ) so maybe THAT would be the ‘catalyst’ for the start of a CIVIL war!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/terry.garcia.5283 Terry Garcia

    We the people voted them in. The gov is TOO big! Acting as NAZIS!!

  • 1tymtrvlr

    The 2nd amendment is not up for negotiation of repeal or change to give the marxists the upper hand, no one has the right to take it away, it was put into the Bill of Rights to protect ourselves from worthless marxists like obama, biden, neopolitan, reid, pelosi. Don’t let them pull the wool over your eyes, don’t just take it as a matter of course. If the regime tries to hinder a well regulated militia by dictat it is an open declaration of war on the American people and our U.S. Constitution. The mere fact that they are pulling out all the stops to try and convince America that they have the power or authority to change the RIGHT is evidence enough that they are up to no good. They definitely have something very evil in mind.

  • 1tymtrvlr

    The marxists want to intimidate law enforement. Why are they going to all this extreme. Be wary of this, the marxists are waving a red flag right in our faces, they are up to something. They know it is not up to Constitutional muster. Time for each and every one of you to decide, time to take a stand. Do we just stand idly by while they put their henchmen in place, removing the good guys that follow our rule of law and U.S. Constitution? The warning signs are flashing, the warning sirens are blaring, this administration is evil, and they are on the march, as hitler did in germany.

  • Donnie J McDonald

    The voters elect the sheriffs, they are not appointed by liberal lunatics. The Sheriffs are directly responsible to the voters and the voters will remove them if they need to. Tell the liberal left wing gun control nuts to stay out of it!

  • Keenan Lee

    I would hope that they would have difficulty filling those positions. So, all the counties would be without a sheriff. Hey, just a thought how about we fire all the Democrats and replace them. Sounds fair to me.

  • George

    Warren, before you do that, you better fire the president who is not enforceing any laws that he doesn’t like. What is juice for the gander, is also juice for the goose.

  • http://twitter.com/ScottCap21 JOSEPH SCOTT

    aren’t sheriff’s elected by the people? how can the state legislators make a law that over rules the people? I’m not super smart but it seems to me that they are taking too much on themselves. the people have the right to recall those self same legislators. there are political consequences.

  • SheriffJon

    In the Texas state legislature, Dallas Democratic Representative Yvonne Davis introduced a measure that would fire any law enforcement officer who disobeys state or federal orders.

    So now, if we don’t enforce immigration laws, we will be fired. Guess I’d better start rounding up Illegals! Where so you want them?

  • gdoggerz

    Funny how do you fire someone who was elected. I will fire BO right now!!!

More in 2nd Amend.

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

To Top
STAY IN THE LOOP
Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become a Patriot Outdoor News insider.

Send this to friend