Connect with us

Debate on gun control should ask whether Congress has power to regulate

2nd Amend.

Debate on gun control should ask whether Congress has power to regulate

President Obama called for more gun control in his State of the Union address last night. The effectiveness of his proposals have been the subject of heated debate. But both sides are missing the larger question: Does Congress even have the right to regulate or ban guns?

Gun control has become one of the preeminent battles of 2013. During a press conference last month, in which he was surrounded by children, President Obama urged Congress to ban “assault” (automatic) weapons, limit magazines to 10 bullets, and introduce universal background checks for all firearm buyers. And last night, Mr. Obama again called for this regulation in his State of the Union address. Naming those affected by gun violence, he asserted to a cheering, standing crowd: “They deserve a vote.”

Across the country, Americans are debating the effectiveness of Obama’s gun-control proposals. Commentators on the left argue that automatic weapons and high-capacity magazines aren’t necessary for home defense or hunting. On the right, the president’s critics say limiting guns won’t end violence and point out that no matter what laws Congress passes, criminals will still find ways to be well armed. The proposed legislation, they contend, simply would put law-abiding citizens at a disadvantage.

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.


  • foxxybey

    They don’t care about the constitution, just their power to be masters of the plantation made up of all colors and races, a bunch of nazi’s in both parties.

  • https://www.facebook.com/app_scoped_user_id/100000124607818/ Michael Wilson

    “Commentators on the left argue that automatic weapons and high-capacity magazines aren’t necessary for home defense or hunting.”
    These @ss hole S. O. Bs. don’t determine what’s necessary for me! Period.

    • violater1

      You are right and it is our right to be armed as well or better than those that obama will move.against us in his lust for power!

  • colt38

    Comments from the left are just uninformed idiots.

  • dad666

    Since when does Obozzo care about the Constitution or any of our rights. He is the Supreme Moron and knows what is best for all of us. Just ask him????

    • Evermyrtle

      He only cares about the constitution if he can accuse a conservative of breaking onr of the rules. That is his only interest int it.

  • MontieR

    Under NO circumstances does the Government have ANY right to regulate arms! Read the constitution
    And NO there is NO room for reasonable regulations. Reasonable regulations are code words for the government makes the choice IF you are allowed to excersize your rights. Our rights come from God NOT the government the bill of rights specifically DENIES the government the power to regulate our rights. ANY politician or judge that allows ANY regulation of our rights no matter who else did it has violated his oath of office and should be impeached. NOT ONE MORE INCH! Molon Labe.

  • pissed off conservative

    let him pass any law he wants patriotic americans will simply ignore them..even if it comes to armed conflict..there is that old saying live free or die..i have already decided what ill do.. proubly die..but not without one hell of a fight..

  • violater1

    When will Congress stand up to obama and tell him that Americans need the same firepower and protection (body armour) as his well armed tyrant force formed under the cloak of the DHS! Someone tell him to his face that he and his force are armed to kill American Citizens not Terrorist as they so lyingly tend to refer to!
    They are hell bent on eliminating Patriotic Americans by every devious means in their power!
    SOMEONE CALL HIS HAND AND CHALLENGE HIM NATIONALLY FACE TO FACE ON CAMERA FOR THE WORLD TO SEE!

    • Derek Schneider

      The problem is Congress is NEVER going to stand up to Obama…
      We need to get rid of ALL of these leeches we have representing us…they are only in it for power, money and perks. They are beholden to lobbyists and big-corporations and could care less WHAT their constituents think. When was the last time ANY politicians came and asked you what you thought about an issue? I had ONE and ONLY one person who was actually running for office come to my door during the last election cycle. She stood and talked to me for 15 minutes…but what impressed me is she asked me what issues were important to me…and LISTENED when I spoke…and gave her take on them. Wasn’t afraid to disagree with me either. I found it remarkably refreshing to actually connect with a politician on a human level. She is my new state Senator…and yes, I voted for her.

  • oldguy199

    “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” what does that mean? Need more people holding the Gov employeeeesss to the chopping block (literaly) and let them know it is OUR decision –not theirs and will be strictly enforced… For decades WE have NOT done our job of being a BOSS , but WE can change and now

  • Wapatia

    This is what Red blooded American ‘s think about gun control. Cabela’s Outdoors just opened a store in Saginaw Michigan and within 1 hour of opening the doors hand gun and 223 ammunition was wiped from the shelves . This shows the real concern OF THE FOR THE PEOPLE!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

    Nope and neither does any one else except for the people. That to is clearly described in the Constitution and how to LEGALLY change it.

  • rikker45

    I wish I could have some of those automatic firearms the idiots on the left keep talking about.

    • Ron

      Ya,, I for one would love to have those automatic firearms!!!!!!

  • Terry C

    Another question is does the president have the authority to regulate guns by executive order, like he is threatening to do if Congress doesn’t? According to the 2nd Amendment, they do not.

  • mickey

    The time is long overdue, IMPEACH OBAMA. Why is he, and other radicals within the Democratic party allowed to keep on with their quest for the takeover of our government. Why are we not weeding out the ones who have become a threat to America, (and there are plenty of them), starting with Feinstein, Pelosi, Waters, Sebilious, Napalitano, Reid, Holder, Geithner, have you noticied the trend here, most of them are radical frustrated women., who are abusive with their powers. Not that there aren’t plenty of men also.

  • machodog

    Today I received in the mail a flyer from the NRA asking me to make my “voice heard and to tell my Representative to stand up for my Second Amendment right”. The NRA should channel their energy and lawyers in the direction of protecting the Second Amendment in the way of getting the laws about guns already on the books REPEALED. Not a one of them is legal. The NRA needs to study the phrase “shall not be infringed” and act on all these existing laws against guns. Infringed means just that. All laws about guns are an infringement on the Second Amendment. NRA needs to rally the people to civil disobedience. Even the Supreme Court has ruled that an unconstitutional law does not have to be obeyed. So, technically, nobody needs to or has to obey any gun law.

  • Florida

    Constitutional attorney Stewart Rhodes will explain The Second Amendment for you.

    …”The whole point of the Second Amendment is to preserve the military capacity of the American people – to preserve the ability of the people, who are the militia, to provide for their own security as individuals, as neighborhoods, towns, counties, and states, during any emergency, man-made or natural; to preserve the military capacity of the American people to resist tyranny and violations of their rights by oath breakers within government; and to preserve the military capacity of the people to defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic, including those oath breaking domestic enemies within government. It is not about hunting, and at its core, the Second Amendment is not really even about self-defense against private criminals. It is about self-defense against public criminals – against tyrants, usurpers, and foreign invaders.

    . Thus, any attempt to ban their possession, sale, purchase, or transfer, is an attempt by Tyrants to disarm the American people.” MOLON LABE

More in 2nd Amend.

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

To Top
STAY IN THE LOOP
Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become a Patriot Outdoor News insider.

Send this to friend