Just a thought with intelligence included.

Every year, the local Sheriffs department can run a nics check on all the Citizens in his jurisdiction and set up a “good to go” and a ‘maybe not’ database.

If the name clears the local dealer, the weapon is sold and the file goes no further.

If the name doesn’t clear, and the person has no problems, the Sheriff files a request for 20 names on the ‘failed’ list and requires proof of ineligibility.

In 30 days if the proof has not been returned on all names submitted, the purchase goes through and the feds do not know which submitted name was the potential buyer or whether or
not a sale was made.

That keeps the criminals from buying, and the feds have no registration database to steal guns from.

The Shared Agendas of George Soros and Barack Obama – Part 3 of 52

Anti-Capitalism

Obama’s anti-capitalist background and views are well documented: His father was a communist; his mother was a communist sympathizer;2 in his youth he was mentored by the communist Frank Marshall Davis; he sought out Marxist friends and professors at Occidental College; he attended Socialist Scholars Conferencesin New York; he was trained in the community-organizing methods of Saul Alinsky, a communist fellow traveler; he developed close ties to the pro-socialist community organization ACORN; he developed close personal and political ties to the infamous Marxists (and former domestic terrorists) Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn; he was hand-picked for his first political office by Alice Palmer, a pro-Soviet figure in Illinois; in the 1990s he became a member of the New Party, a socialist political coalition; he had close connections to theMidwest Academy, a radical training ground which author Stanley Kurtz has described as a “crypto-socialist organization”;3 and he spent twenty years attending the church of Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who preaches the Marxist doctrines of liberation theology. As President, Obama appointed Carol Browner, a former “commissioner” of the Socialist International as his “environment czar”;4 he employed a White House communications director (Anita Dunn) who cited Mao Zedong as one of her “favorite political philosophers”;5 he appointed a “science czar,” John Holdren, who views capitalism as a system that is inherently destructive of the environment;6 he appointed Van Jones, a longtime revolutionary communist, as his “green jobs czar”;7 and he strongly favors the redistribution of wealth, both within the U.S. and across international borders. The list, of course, could go on and on.

The Shared Agendas of George Soros and Barack Obama

While George Soros was busy bankrolling his battalion of established activist groups and launching a few new ones of his own, he quite naturally looked toward the upcoming presidential election of 2008 with great anticipation, eagerly awaiting the day when George W. Bush would finally leave office. The question was, who would replace him? In recent years, all indications had been that Soros favored Hillary Clinton above most, if not all, other potential Democratic candidates for President. But now there was a new face on the scene¯a young, charismatic U.S. senator from Illinois named Barack Obama¯who seemed not only to share virtually all of Soros’s values and agendas, but also appeared to be a highly skilled politician who stood a good chance of getting elected to the nation’s highest office.

Q: What is the Democrat doing when he holds his hands tightly over his ears?
A: Trying to hold on to a thought.

Q: Why did the Liberal have blisters on their lips?
A: From trying to blow out lightbulbs.

Q: What the difference between Nancy Pelosi and the rear end of a horse?
A: I don’t know either.

Q: What is it called when Obama blows in Hillary’s ear?
A: Data transfer.

Apparently,…these “intellectuals” cannot comprehend plain english…they do not seem to understand what “Shall not be infringed” means!

Know I remember what Feinstein reminds me of…”NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD”! She needs to retire and get a competent replacement!!!

anyone who votes for that bill is a traitor and should be treated as such no exceptions period.

This traitor and oath vioator needs to be impeached and imprisoned for her actions. This is a BLATANT attempt not to control but to eradicate the right to bear arms and that is a DIRECT violation of the US constitution’s 2nd amendment. If those less than bright scions in the Senate pass this abortion, they will be totally responsible for what ensues and, I am pretty sure that when the smoke clears, there will no longer be any objection to maintainence of the 2nd Amendment or the constitution as all opposition to their maintainence will have been itself, eradicted and on a most permanent basis.

So evidently she is too stupid to realize that a Semi-Automatic Pistol does have detachable Magazines but she wants to make sure the Second Amendment is saved ?? Yeah right, just another Female that knows nothing abvout Firearms, even if she does have one and if she does own one, she definitely is, where the “danger” comes from. There may be a Semi-Automatic Pistol, somewhere, that has a “Second Pistol Grip”, I sure would like to see one of them, any pictures anywhere???

Limiting guns that can be bought by citizens, something that has been going on for some time, not just under Obama, has and will always be an infringement of the 2nd amendment. Fienstien is violating her oath, Obama is violating his, Biden is violating his and any in congress that vote for this bill are violating thier oaths and are subject to treason

the woman,if she even has any american blood flowing in her body, needs a hard core education, there are 22 “youth” rifles that are semi auto, have removable 10 round clip included with them and a 25 round clip available. the lady is far beyond ignorant although the Bible does say “my people perish for lack of knowledge” but she has entered the realm of stupidity. I will fight to keep my rights.

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”
- except for whatever arms these fascist democidal morons like Obozo and Di Fi want the serfs to have.
NOT!
This is treason pure and simple, taking names and checking them twice.
RESIST TYRANNY, DO NOT COMPLY.

I sent the following definitions to Feinstein. I guess she has chosen to ignore the English language and by doing so has vaiolated her oath of office. Limiting is in fact infringing/encroaching.
***
Words have meanings! If those meanings are bastardized all becomes chaos.
“Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.” James Madison
Definition of to KEEP: to hold or retain in one’s possession; hold as one’s own.
Definition of to BEAR: to carry, transmit, transport, have a characteristic of and exhibit.
Definition of INFRINGE: to “encroach” upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another.
THIS IS THE WORD MOST FORGETEN……INFRINGE!!!!! Read the meaning!!!
Definition of INFRINGE/ENCROACH…….. 1: to enter by “GRADUAL STEPS OR BY STEALTH” (MY BOLD) into the possessions or rights of another. 2: to advance beyond the usual or proper limits
Why is this so hard to understand? The meanings of the words in the Second Amendment have not changed since the amendment was ratified.
I am not aware of the Second Amendment being repealed or amended.

Feinstein is an enemy of all free peoples, as is her Master in the White House, the socialist Muslim-in-Chief. The American People are already gearing up to ignore her gun ban, if it should ever see the light of day, but our congress-creatures in the House and the Senate all need to be reminded that they do not work for Obambi, or Dingy Harry, or even the DNC; but for their own constituents, and that those constituents do not approve of any of this!

Gun owners should vote out of congress any member who votes for a gun ban of any kind & I hope this website gives their names & their vote so every gun owner knows who to vote against or for when their term comes up for a vote. I will vote against any congressman or woman who votes for any ban in my state of Indiana.

is her “not being unlimited” what I understand the same as “INFRINGED”…..hmmm….??

“Shall not be infringed” means “Unlimited”!

Somebody somewhere soon…Please slap some sense into this dimwit’s head! 7pap7…not just her, but a whole lot need to be tried by a jury of CITIZENS and then dismissed accordingly.

Uhhh, We, The People have no POTUS–What We, The People DO HAVE is an “illegal alien,” in the White House, illegally, with an illegal (for him) Social Security Card, plenty of videos taken in 2007 and 2008 in which he admits that he was NOT born in the USA–which automatically disqualifies him from BEING IN THE USA, much less becomming the POTUS and bankrupting our country! Why wasn’t this “alien” vetted–especially being a citizen of Kenya?

Another thing the left wants to take away so they can have unlimited power and leave us defenseless. It is really like the Hitler regime all over again. We need to stop it now and get our country back from these idiots who think they are gods. I never thought this would happen in America but if our government is against us what can we expect. Where are the democrats that believe in the USA? Why aren’t they speaking up? Surely they don’t all think the communist dictators in charge are right? What have they been promised if they keep their mouths shut? Pieces of silver?

Reply to

Raymond – The United States of America passed away on November 6, 2012

I always thought with President John Kennedy signing the Globalist Plan to Disarm America: PL87-297 Arms Control and Disarmament Act / UN Small Arms Treaty / State Department Publication No.7277 [May 1962] clearly that was the end of America. Once President Kennedy for the US Government signed those international treaties, all US citizens were subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. From that information: “The terms “arms control” and “disarmament” mean the identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control, reduction, or elimination, of armed forces and armaments of all kinds under international agreement including the necessary steps taken under such an agreement to establish an effective system of international control, or to create and strengthen international organizations for the maintenance of peace.” In short “with the decision and signature of a single individual acting like a dictator” Kennedy passed authority and control to the United Nations. If you have not read the Globalist Plan I suggest you do so and I also suggest you circulate this information to others. Reading, knowing what it says will help you understand what we as a people are facing today in our nation.
____
There has been a long standing questioning why Kenndy signed this document; some suggest he did so under duress and that he did so to conceal major indescretions from going public.
____
I don’t recall a single instance of Kennedy asking any American how they felt about this issue. And as it violated directly the Bill of Rights, The Constitution, and the Amendments signing that document was an impeachable offense and in direct ethical conflict with his oat in office to support, defend, and affirm the laws of this nation and to protect the American peoples under the Bill of Rights, The Constitution, and the Amendments. Clearly un-Constitutional I do not know why even today this has not been challenged by the Supreme Court?

Military definition of an “Assault Rifle” a Rifle having the ability by a selector switch to change from SEMI Automatic fire ( one pull of trigger causes 1 bullet to be fired) to FULL Automatic fire (one pull of trigger causes bullets to SPRAY OUT RAPIDLY until trigger is released or weapon runs out of ammo)……. ALL Fully Automatic weapons have been banned sense the 1930′s ie Thompson Sub Machine Gun AKA the (Chicago Type Writer), Browning Automatic Rifle AKA (BAR), All of these weapons were available to the General Public prior to 1930′s BAN… Those in possession of them nowadays are Licensed with strict controls and tracking by BATF… ALL other weapons sold to the General Public are not “Assault Weapons” no matter what is attached to them… They are LOOK alike weapons that men find COOL LOOKING… Kinda Like men who buy the CIVILIAN model Hummer.. Or Put Racing Stripes on their Car or otherwise make them LOOK like something they are not… Gun-Grabbers use the term ‘Assault Rifles’ to instil fear, and hold them up as proof of their claim from having the LOOKS of a military gun.. They (Gun-Grabbers) also twist the 2nd Amendment meaning in modern times as the protection of HUNTING by SPORTSMEN and as such, ‘There is no need for “Assault Rifles” or “High Capacity” magazines to go “HUNTING”…

Let us be clear, the 2nd Amendment has NOTHING to do with HUNTING ! OR the Guns used for that Purpose….. The 2nd Amendment has EVERYTHING to do with PRESERVING LIBERTY ! AND the Guns used for that purpose! So we have ALREADY gave up our TRUE ASSAULT GUNS back in the 1930′s, that was the FIRST major attack on Citizens Rights to bear arms… This bill is the SECOND assault on our Rights to even own SEMI Automatic Weapons and to Limit the Magazine size of them to only 10 rounds of ammo… But it also EXEMPTS Politicians and other Government agents from this Law……. That means only Politicians, Government Agents and of Course Criminals will be Heavily armed… That means Your 10/22 Rugar 22 Caliber plinking rifle is banned because it is a SEMI auto Weapon and you certainly can not have fun and convenience of having a 20 or 30 round magazine for it.. Right now in Feinstein’s Bill, you can have a bolt action, pump action, lever action or single shot rifle with a magazine of 10 or less capability.. Those used for hunting! What next and there will be a next gun-grabbing excuse down the road, will we be reduced to relying on Black Power single shot muzzle loading Rifles and Black Powder revolvers from the 1800′s to protect ourselves? Think this is a joke? There are current federal laws banning truck drivers from having guns for self protection EVEN if they have CCL permits, some states expand that to even having stun guns in their trucks… Truckers are buying unregulated Black Powder Pistols which require no license, FFL background check and can be mailed from seller to buyer without registration… It is Happening RIGHT NOW.. Where will it end? History tells us where it will end….

the dick act.1902

DICK ACT of 1902… CAN’T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) – Protection Against Tyrannical Government

Submitted by Jonathan on Sun, 03/29/2009 – 2:04pm.

The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.

** SPREAD THIS TO EVERYONE **

The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army.

The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.

The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.

The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion).

These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.

Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, “the Organized Militia (the National Guard) can not be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States.”

The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been impeached.

During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada.

The bill was defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send them out of the country.

The fact is that the President has no constitutional right, under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the borders of the USA, and not even beyond the borders of their respective states.

Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold.

Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states:

“The militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United States.” In these pages we also find a statement made by Daniel Webster, “that the great principle of the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the militia of the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants and limits the power of Congress over it.”

“This limitation upon the power to raise and support armies clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army to voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and conscript was intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless and puerile thing to limit the use of money for that purpose.

Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to be, and if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict with the limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same section and article, certainly some restriction or limitation would have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such power.”

The Honorable William Gordon

Congressional Record, House, Page 640 – 1917

Re-Posted Nov. 3, 2009 – FourWinds10

Feinstein shoud be put out to pasture. This BULLDOG/BAG LADY, sure is no credit to the office she now holds, she is going against everything American. In fact the whole Democratic party should be under an intense watch for the ones who broke their oath of office, and are actually at war with the American people that they are supposed to represent the wishes of. I’d like to see the whole congress changed out. I sure don’t think that Hillary should be awarded any peace prize? If anything she should be fired from this office with shame, for not doing her job. Watch and see what happens, the leftists will bestow honors on her, that she doesn’t deserve.

We have Elected Representatives who are violating the Constitution in Gun Control attempts in Congress that have no Constitutional authority to do so and is expressly forbidden from doing so..

Question?

Is it time that Citizens within their respective States bring Class Action Law Suits against those Representatives who Violate their Oaths of Office by supporting such Gun Control measures?

Is it time to hold our Representatives responsible for their violation of trust and illegal acts in our name as our representatives in a Republic? Are we not damaged by the loss of GOD GIVEN Rights expressly forbidden of infringements by Government? Are we not entitled to sue for those damages if those damages were caused by our representatives illegal acts?

Some will say Legislators are immune to being sued, Really?

Legislative Immunity, The immunity attaches to any legislator acting in the sphere of any LEGITIMATE legislative activity..

Sense Congress is given NO Constitutional Authority to change anything about the 2nd Amendment and is actually refrained from doing so by that very same Amendment it would NOT be a legitimate act for Congress to address or entertain the limitation of….

I say yes and will explore options….

Feinstine is like all the IGNORANT LIBERALS who do not understand the Constitution like their IDIOT LEADER Obama even though he was supposed to have studied it in Collage and taught it for ten years.All people are equal under our Constitution.She thinks her and the rest of Obama’s thugs are like the old party members of the Communist Party in the USSR which were more equal than those not in their party so those who were non party do not have the saame rights.Well We are not under that STUPIDITY and OUR Constitution says we are all equal and that means if IDIOTS like her can have a gun so can those of Us who have brains which her WORTHLESS ILK lack.

Politicians are like diapers,they should be changed often and for the same reason…term limits for all…

Feinstein is disgusting. She should keep her mouth shut about something she probably knows nothing about. The only reason she jumped into this is so she can gain a place on the front page due to the facrt that she knows everyone realizes she is ONE BIG B_ _ CH !

If there was ever a person that justified a case for retroactive abortion, Diane Feinstein is the one. Her constituents must be a stupid as she is.