Connect with us

Pedophilia’s Just Another Sexual Orientation, Gun Owners, Those Are the Real Wackos!

2nd Amend.

Pedophilia’s Just Another Sexual Orientation, Gun Owners, Those Are the Real Wackos!

So let’s get this straight. According to the folks at Gawker, pedophilia may well be just another sexual orientation that should not be illegal. But college kids owning guns and living in gun-friendly dorms, well, that’s just plain craziness.

In a dismissive post published yesterday afternoon, Gawker’s Mallory Ortberg scoffed that, at least so far, no one was clamoring to move into a planned dorm at the University of Colorado which will be open only to students who are at least 21 years old and who have concealed-carry permits:

Why would some of these students choose to stay in their current living situations? Some of them are undoubtedly too busy clicking their spurs together and shooting multiple revolvers into the air, Yosemite Sam-style, to have heard the news. Others may be buried underneath a pile of commemorative, pearl-handled shooters purchased at the most recent gun show, unable to reach the door. At least two are currently building a recreation of the Fortress of Solitude off-campus in the nearby woods, crafting a sleek, silent Gun Palace where they will never again have to explain to their bemused RAs why they choose to own guns or submit to being corralled into weaponized dorm zones. With cobalt-blue bolt bedframes and state-of-the-art pistol slide door hinges, the Gun Palace is the only choice for the discriminating CU gun owner.

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.


  • https://www.facebook.com/app_scoped_user_id/1337492043/ Brian Engman

    I warned that this would be the next “study” that the liberal left came up with to try to make another group “normal.” Now these sicko’s are trying to make our children targets for these sick b****rds.

    • sandraleesmith46

      I started warning about this one, and rapists will be next, back in the ’70s when homosexuality was taken out of the DSM IV’s behavioral dysfunctions list. NAMBLA began angling for it immediately when that happened! Most people didn’t even SEE that story buried in the back of the news, and didn’t believe me; I was just being “chicken little” and the “sky was falling”… SO, did it fall oh YOU yet????

  • waterman

    Oh yea, lets let the fa&^ots have their way with our children, but lets stop all those God awful guns from getting into the hands of responsible gun owners’ children or pre-adults. How stupid….. when are we going to stand up to these fa^%ot loving, lying, perverted, swindling, dumb-ass fu^*ing liberal demobats that want to destroy our country. If you don’t like the rant……quit reading it…….I am not politically correct nor will ever be politically correct. I believe in free press and freedom of speech.
    That’s what’s beautiful about free speech, you can say what you want and if people don’t like it then they can just not read it, or they can say what they think of what you said.
    Either way, we can all get our point across the way we choose to do so.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/SF2BOEGRU2JGBNTZMWV3HX5GIY buddy

      water man.. what should we do.. i’m with you brother… just need to get the rest of the patriots on board and plan our attack….my email is cfjinterprises@fuse.net..

      • $5164204

        We need to take to the streets like true freedom loving peoples have and are doing around the world.. We need to get our fat asses off the couch and rise up for Freedom.. Setting on the couch complaining isn’t going to get it… The time for talk is over….

        • granny

          So where does granny meet up w/ you. I’m off the couch & want to rise up to help us rid our USA of the idiots.

          • $5164204

            You start in your own neighborhood….. Get people off THEIR couches to join you.. Write letters to the local editor asking for action not words…. Forget ‘Political Correctness’ speak out, confront misinformation…. That’s were we start locally all over this nation…

    • char51

      the u.n. says its ok for these men to have sex as young as 5. and you people who voted for obama has given the u.n. all it needs to make it happen.

    • fliteking

      I wanna buy you a beer!

  • usmc1063

    Thomas Paine once wrote that “Attempting to debate with a person without reason is like giving medicine to the dead.” The same results avail. Pedophillia causes more damage in one year than any legal gun owner ever could. The sheer absuritdy of the statement is beyond reason but that is the liberal mindset. They see Gun owners as the sick and depraved yet those who rape children just having another sexual orentation. Now how sick is that?

    • granny

      usmc1063…..the jerk is afraid of we that carry because if he messes w/ anyones kids, he is dead meat.

    • char51

      i agree with you, as long as hes in there will be nothing but bad news for the people. bad times are acoming,get ready. obama going to set the brown coats on us, share the wealth, prase him as a god or you might die. this man is not above it, and dont think he wouldnt due it, obama has blood on his hands and not done yet. and no, im not nuts.

  • R.A. Roy

    Anyone who thinks that pedophilia is a normal sexual orientation should be taken out and shot. I don’t care how that sounds, you touch a child an anyway that is sexual you deserve to die! In fact I ever see anything like that happening I will kill the person myself! That is not a threat, it is a promise, children are to be treasured not raped! The pedophiles want to ban guns to make it easier for them to get at children and I for one will not stand for that!

    • sandraleesmith46

      Don’t waste a bullet, just put them in a prison general population and let out WHY they’re there; those “gentlemen” are very articulate at explaining why being a “short-eyes” is unacceptable behavior!

      • Straightarrow

        That would cost us taxpayers too much. I agree with Ms. Hughes.

        • sandraleesmith46

          Not in the general population, when they know; “short-eyes” don’t last long at all!

  • Scooter Orsburn

    This Ortberg woman is obviously a mental deficient , and needs counselling immediatly , after which she should be deported to the Comunist country of her choice .

  • frank jones

    No, what you are “waterman” is ignorant and hate filled. Gay doesn’t mean child molester. I carry my guns for several reasons but two of them are to protect myself and others from criminals, the other is to protect myself and others from morons like yourself. You want to go rail against pedophiles, more power to ya but you should probably pull your head outa your ass.

    • sandraleesmith46

      Gay doesn’t mean homosexual EITHER; it MEANS light hearted and happy; neither of which applies to homosexuals! USE the correct words and what they truly mean, if you wish to communicate with educated folks! And NAMBLA is a group of MALE homosexual PEDOPHILES!

    • granny

      Mr jones., its not that anyone will say Gays are child molesters. In the past there have been gay men that are guilty of this act. Those we know that only want children are the ones that we do not want in our society. I have know gays that were accepted by the mass. Its like we know that Blacks commit more crimes than whites, but not all blacks commit crimes. There are some whites that do the same thing. There are those that do not think before they speak. For those, please do not think we all are like that. But the jlambert was a jerk for thinking & writing those stupid words. Low IQ.

    • waterman

      Oh yea, Fwank. Did I hit a nerve are you one those. Let me tell ya Gay don’t mean happy either, at least the way ya’ll use the word, now isn’t that funny, you guys have even perverted a good word like gay ( which should me happy) gays don’t make me happy. I guess when you boys are getting corn cobbed it makes you happy, I don’t know.

  • granny

    jlambert is afraid of guns thats for sure. Maybe he is a pedophile that knows he will get shot by a person that carries. Boo Hoo….. Bet he has those movies on his computer w/ children and pedophiles. Those that protest too much usually are the guilty of the worst kind. I hope his neighbors know what kind of a deranged mind he has.

  • $13614178

    Forget it waterman , free speech , unless it is politcally correct , no longer exists , and within the next four years the second amendment will go the same way . They may not be outright banned but they will make it so complicated most people will just throw up their hands in surrender . And the faggots ? The cream of the crop . In fact you will have to prove you are some kind of pervert to teach or adopt kids , many faggot judges have already adopted these practices .

  • GDC

    I have been posting that message for years. I am glad someone is waking up!

  • GDc

    Adult sexual attraction to early-stage adolescents:
    phallometry doesn’t equal pathology.

    Zander TK.

    Comment
    on

    Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V.
    This is how they are starting!!!

  • GDC

    Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V.

    Blanchard R,
    Lykins AD,
    Wherrett D,
    Kuban ME,
    Cantor JM,
    Blak T,
    Dickey R,
    Klassen PE.

    Source

    Law and Mental Health Program,
    Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College Street, Toronto, Ontario,
    Canada. ray_blanchard@camh.net

    Abstract

    The term pedophilia denotes the
    erotic preference for prepubescent children. The term hebephilia has been
    proposed to denote the erotic preference for pubescent children (roughly, ages
    11 or 12-14), but it has not become widely used. The present study sought to
    validate the concept of hebephilia by examining the agreement between
    self-reported sexual interests and objectively recorded penile responses in the
    laboratory. The participants were 881 men who were referred for clinical
    assessment because of paraphilic, criminal, or otherwise problematic sexual
    behavior. Within-group comparisons showed that men who verbally reported
    maximum sexual attraction to pubescent children had greater penile responses to
    depictions of pubescent children than to depictions of younger or older
    persons. Between-groups comparisons showed that penile responding distinguished
    such men from those who reported maximum attraction to prepubescent children
    and from those who reported maximum attraction to fully grown persons. These
    results indicated that hebephilia exists as a discriminable erotic
    age-preference. The authors recommend various ways in which the DSM might be altered
    to accommodate the present findings. One possibility would be to replace the
    diagnosis of Pedophilia with Pedohebephilia and allow the clinician to specify
    one of three subtypes: Sexually Attracted to Children Younger than 11
    (Pedophilic Type), Sexually Attracted to Children Age 11-14 (Hebephilic Type),
    or Sexually Attracted to Both (Pedohebephilic Type). We further recommend that
    the DSM-V encourage users to record the typical age of children who most
    attract the patient sexually as well as the gender of children who most attract
    the patient sexually.

    And they say that It is NOT a pathology!!!

    And they say that It is NOT a pathology!!!

  • GDC

    Hebephilia Is Not a Mental Disorder in DSM-IV-TR and
    Should Not Become One in DSM-5

    Allen Frances, MD and

    Michael B. First, MD

    +
    Author Affiliations

    Dr. Frances is Professor Emeritus, Department of
    Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University, Durham, NC. Dr. First
    is Professor of Clinical Psychiatry, Columbia University, and Research
    Psychiatrist, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY

    Address correspondence to: Allen Frances, MD, 1820
    Avenida del Mundo, Coronado, CA 92118. E-mail: allenfrances@vzw.blackberry.net

    Next Section

    Abstract

    The paraphilia section of Diagnostic
    and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision
    (DSM-IV-TR) is being misinterpreted in the forensic evaluations of sexually
    violent offenders. The resulting misuse of the term paraphilia not otherwise
    specified, hebephilia, has justified the inappropriate involuntary commitment
    of individuals who do not in fact qualify for a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of mental
    disorder. This article has two purposes: to clarify what the DSM-IV-TR was
    meant to convey and how it has been twisted in translation within the legal
    system, and to warn that the DSM-5 proposal to include pedohebephilia threatens
    to make the current bad situation very much worse in the future.

    Twenty states and the federal
    government have passed statutes that allow for the involuntary psychiatric
    commitment of sexually violent predators (SVPs) to begin after their prison
    sentence has already been served. These statutes were passed as a public safety
    measure in response to egregious sexual offenses committed shortly after
    release by former prisoners who had received relatively short sentences.
    Central to all the statutes is a requirement that the SVP offender be diagnosed
    with a mental disorder or abnormality. The five to four Supreme Court ruling in
    Kansas v. Hendricks1
    that narrowly supported the constitutionality of SVP statutes rests completely
    on a presumed ability to distinguish individuals who are mentally disordered
    from those who are common criminals. Otherwise, the continued involuntary
    incarceration would clearly represent double jeopardy and a denial of due
    process. There is no constitutional justification for continued preventive
    retention once a prison sentence has been served, unless dangerousness is
    specifically caused by mental abnormality.

    The Supreme Court ruling does not
    require that the qualifying mental abnormality be a Diagnostic and Statistical
    Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-defined disorder, but in actual practice,
    evaluators invariably use one or another of the DSM categories to justify their
    findings. Although it varies from state to state, the two most commonly used
    DSM diagnoses to justify involuntary commitment are generally pedophilia and
    paraphilia NOS (most often NOS, nonconsent, but more recently also NOS,
    hebephilia).2,3
    There has been some, but limited, controversy about the suitability of
    pedophilia,4,5
    but it is generally accepted within the field as a qualifying DSM-IV-TR mental
    disorder. The grounds for accepting paraphilia NOS as a qualifying mental
    disorder are much shakier.

    In the first half of this article,
    we discuss the current misuse of the concept paraphilia NOS, hebephilia, in
    involuntary SVP commitments. In the second half, we discuss the weaknesses of
    the DSM-5 proposal for a new diagnosis of pedohebephilia and its detrimental
    consequences.

  • Americas Best

    bring me a child molestor … and I’ll be the FIRST to put them out of our misery!

  • http://michigancplblog.wordpress.com/ The Lone Gunman

    The Leftists will always choose the life-destroying over the life-saving, the profane over the sacred. The lies and the hate are in their blood, they are defined by these things, which would be character flaws in anyone else. They are so easily led, so easily brainwashed, because of these traits that they will believe anything their masters want them to believe. I don’t see them as Americans, I see them as lost souls wandering in the dark, eager to snuff out any glimmer of light. Pity them, but never turn your back on them. http://michigancplblog.wordpress.com/

    • waterman

      Good words, Lone Gunman,

  • Sarah Conner

    No p.c. here…never have,never will…any pedophil comes near me or mine will not live to regret it…

  • http://michigancplblog.wordpress.com/ The Lone Gunman

    Sexual predators are NOT curable and punishment does not change their ways. We have seen this over and over again and many states now take this into account by committing their sex offenders to involuntary psychiatric care after their prison sentence is done. Those who argue for tolerance and understanding of these monsters are the same ones who have eroded America’s moral core by pushing moral relativism and other liberal rubbish. As a society we have to have standards and we have to protect the vulnerable against these monsters. http://michigancplblog.wordpress.com/

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/XNCEW6BL6GHCAZWKJHAKHAFL7Y BARBARA

    Did anyone stop to think they want our “toting” tudents in one place so as to:
    a. Not convert other students
    b. Have them all in one place when the revolution starts.com

More in 2nd Amend.

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

To Top
STAY IN THE LOOP
Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become a Patriot Outdoor News insider.

Send this to friend