What Obama says is usually radically different from what he does. How anyone in their right mind can trust a professional liar like him is beyond me anyway. But for those who may wonder what Obama would do to your gun rights if given the chance the answer is simple. He’d do the same thing that any and every other Marxist dictator would do. He’d eliminate them totally and either persecute or if necessary eliminate anyone who resisted.The only guns that Communists like Obama want around are the ones that the military,police,and their private security details have. All others should be gone forever as far as they’re concerned. They know that an armed citizenry is a danger to their lust for power.

criminals kill people not guns. a gun never pulled a trigger.

I have news for Obama and the Government ———– go stick it where the sun doesn’t shine. The Government is asking for more trouble than they can imagine, especially here in Texas.

When they talk about the 2nd amendment they always bring up the hunting and self defense thing and if you read what it says and what the founders had intended it has nothing to do with hunting or self defense it has to do with stopping the tyranny of our own government on its people. People need to wake up and understand what this is all about. To defend your self from being hurt by others is a God given right, to protect our selves from the Government is the 2nd Amendment. So when they chip away at this is all about keeping us from doing just that. And if we are to stop the government from putting tyranny upon its own people then were suppose to go out with our shot gun and fight the government who will bring Machine guns, Tanks, and Air force just how do you plan on stopping them with your hunting rifle and shot gun?

We need our guns to protect us from a oppressive government.

What Muhammed Obama would “like” to do to our gun rights don’t amount to much. What they are already doing to “help” their own cause will continue to bite them in the ass.(F&F) (U.N.) WE need to continue educating each other on “them” and be ever vigilent and cautious. The snakes are everywhere, and when the time comes, do what we normally do to snakes. Untill then, shoot straight, and keep yer powder dry. Semper Fi brothers and sisters!!

These anti gun nuts don’t care about criminals having guns as long as we are disarmed and can’t rise against them. This is the real reason they want our guns. We are a deterrent to their desired tyranny.

Could Obama use NDAA To Arrest Militias?

Could Obama use NDAA To Arrest Militias on the Premise members are Militants and Belligerents
that pose a threat to National Security?

Recently the Obama administration stated to Federal Judge Katherine Forest that under (NDAA) The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 the President had authorization to lock up belligerents indefinitely. That they (were justified) to lock belligerents up indefinitely—because cases involving belligerents directly-aligned with militants against the good of America—warrants such punishment.) Pres. Obama could use NDAA provisions to order U.S. Military Forces to round up without evidence, millions of Americans including militias by alleging they are belligerents or a threat to National Security.
Many observers believe Obama intends to extend NDAA to imprison U.S. Citizens in Indefinite Detention not involved with or associated with enemy forces.

Hitler included similar provisions in his fascist (Discriminatory Decrees signed February 28, 1933). Almost immediately after the German Parliament passed Hitler’s laws, the Reich Government ordered the arrest of German Citizens and confiscated their guns without probable cause or evidence; delegated powers to German Police and other authorities to arrest anyone Nazi authorities claimed attempted or incited public unrest: arrested among others were outspoken Germans, writers, journalists, peaceful protestors and artists. After World War II the East German Secret Police (Stasi) used the threat of Indefinite Detention to forcibly recruit thousands of informants.

The U.S. 2012 NDAA legislation Obama signed 12-31-11 is similar to Hitler’s 1933 fascist laws the SS and Gestapo used to target persons in Germany for arrest, imprisonment and execution without probable cause; and confiscate millions of dollars of property. Hitler used his laws to suspend Parliament and the Supreme Court insuring his laws could not be rescinded.

During the Obama Administration’s recent request for a (stay) to stop U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest blocking enforcement of vague NDAA provisions, the Obama Administration—never clarified what constitutes a (belligerent); or militant; or what belligerent activities (directly aligned with a militant) to order a belligerent’s arrest or indefinite detention; or what is against the good of America. Under vague provisions of NDAA, the President could accuse anyone of being (directly aligned with militants by way of any political or other association; activity, statement, writing or communication with an individual or group government deemed (militant) to arrest and indefinitely detain Americans. Writers, journalists, Americans that disagree with or question U.S. Government or its allies—may under NDAA be subject to arrest and indefinite detention.

NDAA 2012, like Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Decrees enforces censorship; refers to the Patriot Act e.g. warrant-less searches of private property and forfeiture of property from persons not charged with crime. Provisions in NDAA 2012 keep the door open for corrupt U.S. police; government agents and provocateurs which there are many, to falsify reports and statements to target any American, group or organization for arrest, indefinite detention, complete disappearance; civil asset forfeiture of their property.

You may have noted NDAA referred to the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act lends itself to Government / police corruption; the Federal Government may use secret witnesses and informants to cause arrests and civil asset forfeiture of Americans’ property. Witness(s) and informants may be paid up to 50% of assets forfeited. Federal Government under 18USC may use a mere preponderance of civil
evidence, little more than hearsay to Civilly Forfeit Private Property. Under the Patriot Act innocent property owners may be barred by government knowing the evidence federal government uses to forfeit their property.

Sections of NDAA 2012 are so broad, it appears U.S. Government or the President could (retroactively) deem an American’s past 1st Amendment activities prior to passage of 2012 NDAA—supported hostilities, terrorism or (Belligerents) to order the arrest and Indefinite Detention of any U.S. Citizen, writer, group or organization.

Under NDAA 2012 it should be expected that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings when interrogated, not allowed legal counsel or habeas corpus may be prosecuted for non-terrorist (ordinary crimes) because of their (alleged admissions) while held in Indefinite Detention.