As usual, the Dictator in Chief Obama gets an F in Constitutional knowledge!!! Time to rid our country of the Dictator in Chief before he does any more damage.

http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/07/obama-must-have-gotten-ak-47-talking-points-from-bill-oreilly/

While speaking
to the National Urban League Convention on Wednesday Obama launched into an
attack on the Second Amendment while trying to dress it up in a bunch of “I
believes” to make it appear as though it were not an attack on the rights of the
American people.

He said the shooting in Aurora, CO this past weekend
should call for a “consensus around violence reduction” in the nation. “These
steps shouldn’t be controversial, they should be common sense,” he said.

“I – like most Americans – believe that the Second Amendment
guarantees an individual the right to bear arms,” Obama said. “I think we
recognize the traditions of gun ownership passed on from generation to
generation, that hunting and shooting are part of a cherished national
heritage.”

“But I also believe that a lot of gun owners would agree that
AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers and not in the hands of crooks. They
belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities,” he added.”

How about those AK-47′s don’t need to be sold to straw buyers, helped
by your administration, and trafficked into Mexico to drug cartels which then
were used to kill hundreds or thousands of Mexicans and two of our own federal
agents, Mr. President?

“As we convene
these conversations, let’s be clear even as we debate government’s role, we have
to understand that when a child opens fire on another child, there’s a hole in
that child’s heart that government alone can’t fill,” he continued. “It’s got to
be up to us as parents, as neighbors and as teachers and as mentors to make sure
our young people don’t have that void inside them. It’s up to us to spend time
with them. To pay more attention to them. To show them more love and they learn
to love each other and they learn to love one another and they grow up knowing
what it is to walk a mile in somebody else’s shoes and to view the world in
somebody else’s eyes.”

It is our responsibility to do those things for sure. The problem is Obama’s
perspective. Government can’t fill anything in that child’s life. The reality is
that when someone opens fire on another person government can’t help that either
and in taking away the ability to obtain certain guns simply deprives
law-abiding citizens from adequate means of protecting themselves, in the event
they need that type of weapon. After all, it isn’t law-abiding citizens
committing crimes, it’s criminals. Sadly people like Obama don’t see that their
laws are completely disregarded by criminals.

There is no doubt that this shooting in Aurora, CO and this speech here is
nothing more than an attempt to get the people ready for the United Nations Arms
Trade Treaty, which is currently being finalized.

I don’t know who these gun owners are that you are speaking of. Maybe
they are a figment of your imagination like your alleged “compilation
girlfriend” was.

Mr. Obama wants America to believe that the Second
Amendment has something to do with “traditions of gun ownership” which he
defines as “hunting and shooting.” Well let me set the record straight for Mr.
Obama and all liberals for that matter. Guns, all guns, are weapons and their
primary function is not for hunting or target practice. Their primary function
is self preservation.

We don’t need Obama telling us which guns belong
where. No gun owner I know would suggest that an AK-47 needs to be out on the
street, unless we are defending our community from a tyrannical government or an
invasion. Then we most certainly need them on the street. But we should be able
to have such a weapon to use to defend our homes, property and the lives of our
families and neighbors. There is nothing immoral or illegal about that.

Obama is pushing nothing but fear mongering. Fine, put more ridiculous
laws in place and see how many criminals abide by them. See how laws get AK-47s
off the street Mr. President. He is as inept in your thinking on gun control as
you were about the stimulus and the economy.

Obama said he’d “continue
to work with members of both parties and with religious groups and with civic
organizations to arrive at a consensus around violence reduction.”

I
have a bit of advice for him. Why doesn’t he take a look at mandatory gun
ownership is working in Kennesaw, Georgia implemented and follow suit? There is
the real proof that gun ownership works and defeats crime. But Obama isn’t
interested in that. He’s interested in control, plain and simple. This is
exactly what people of his mindset have done before. They want more gun control,
so they can exercise more control over the population. It’s all about control.

Its not really gun control obumer wants. It is people control. Every country that has had a dictator, has first disarmed its people.

You will NOT take them. The miltary and police will not help you, and the first blue helmet I see coming down the street, gets a bullet in it. WE THE PEOPLE will pry those AK-47′s from yout cold, dead hands.

If there really is 100,000,000 gun owners in the USA that is enough to win the Election! If the hunters don’t say he is leaving me alone, I don’t own a hand gun so I don’t care if he bans those!! We all better care! If they get a hold one gun they will get them ALL at some point.

Since Obama seems ignorant of the history and true meaning of the Second Amendment here is some educational information for him.
***”The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. They deserve a place of honor with all that is good. When firearms go, all goes. We need them every hour.” – George Washington in address to the 2nd session of the United States Congress.
***“Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples’ liberty’s teeth.” (George Washington)
***”The right of self-defense is the first law of nature; in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and when the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.” Henry St. George Tucker, in Blackstone’s 1768 “Commentaries on the Laws of England.”, Judge of the Virginia Supreme Court & U.S. Dist. Court of Virginia

***”Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes… Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas Jefferson, quoting Cesare Beccaria
Those who argue that the Second Amendment was written just for militias are completely blown out of the water by the following quote from Thomas Jefferson.
“The strongest reason for “people” (My emphasis) to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” – Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 (C. J. Boyd, Ed., 1950)
James Madison is credited with the writing of the “Bill of Rights” and was pretty clear about the meaning on the Second Amendment.
“The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the “people” (My emphasis) with arms.”
Here are a few others who help define the true meaning of the Second Amendment. It becomes very clear upon the examination of the meanings attached to the Second Amendment by our Founding Fathers that the original intent of the Second Amendment is being attacked in order to eventually disarm the American people.
***”I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.”
George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
***”Whereas civil-rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as military forces, which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.”
– Tench Coxe, in Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution
***”The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.”
– Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers at 184-188
***”That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms … ”
– Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at 86-87 (Pierce & Hale, eds., Boston, 1850)
***”Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive.”
–Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution (Philadelphia 1787).
***”No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”
– Thomas Jefferson, Proposal Virginia Constitution, 1 T. Jefferson Papers, 334,[C.J. Boyd, Ed., 1950]
***” … to disarm the people – that was the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”
– George Mason, 3 Elliot, Debates at 380
***”The right [to bear arms] is general. It may be supposed from the phraseology of this provision that the right to keep and bear arms was only guaranteed to the militia; but this would be an interpretation not warranted by the intent. The militia, as has been explained elsewhere, consists of those persons who, under the laws, are liable to the performance of military duty, and are officered and enrolled for service when called upon…. [I]f the right were limited to those enrolled, the purpose of the guarantee might be defeated altogether by the action or the neglect to act of the government it was meant to hold in check. The meaning of the provision undoubtedly is, that the people, from whom the militia must be taken, shall have the right to keep and bear arms, and they need no permission or regulation of law for the purpose. But this enables the government to have a well-regulated militia; for to bear arms implies something more than mere keeping; it implies the learning to handle and use them in a way that makes those who keep them ready for their efficient use; in other words, it implies the right to meet for voluntary discipline in arms, observing in so doing the laws of public order.”
– Thomas M. Cooley, General Principles of Constitutional Law, Third Edition [1898]
Then there are politicians who insist in taking our Constitution out of context of time and original meaning. James Madison warned us against this.
“Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.”

I’ve given up on ever believing anything the jerk says. He’s in full campaign mode 24/7 and trying to rustle up votes from whatever constituency he’s addressing at the moment. Second amendment? When he speaks to his left-wing base he says what they want to hear.

He’s a liar.

That’s the bottom line.

I feel the battle has just begun. Obummer lies,about everything,his speech only bespeaks of deeper intentions to get our guns anyway he can.Placate most of “hunters/sportsmen” I,I,I like the 2nd Amendment… He cannot produce a single paper of his past,away to hide his socialist/hitler agenda. Disarm and conquer…A fact,we have more gun owners in the US that DO NOT VOTE or NOT REGISTERED TO VOTE..how can this be…especially with the enviroment we are facing.. The UN /Hillary /Obummer want are weapons of self defense. We must take a stand..
I am a Viet Vet,I have a carry permit for many states,I teach courses for the NRA and NSSCA yet I meet people that MAY NOT VOTE… Why ,don’t like the conserative..A NO Vote is a vote for Obummer.
Let us band together and get the vote out.. Make every effort to defeat “ALL” DemocRats in the Senate and replace with as many Conservatives as we can. Reclaim and the same in the Congress….Let Us take back our Beloved America our we will be lost forever. GOD BLESS AMERICA!!

Where do I go to get my Tyrant Hunting License? Because surely if the founders meant guns only for hunting, they meant for tyrants to be the big game…..